Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s attorney also defended the Unabomber and Jared Loughner

A TV near the site of the Boston Marathon bombing displays Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s picture.
A TV near the site of the Boston Marathon bombing displays Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s picture.
A TV near the site of the Boston Marathon bombing displays Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s picture.
Mario Tama / Getty Images News

Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, who’s accused of bombing the 2013 Boston Marathon, will be defended by Judy Clarke, an attorney who previously defended the Unabomber, Jared Loughner, and other high-profile killers.

The New York Times reported:

Ms. Clarke is famous for cutting deals that keep her clients off death row. At some point in the process, her clients — including Theodore Kaczynski, the Unabomber; Eric Rudolph, the Olympic Park bomber; and Jared L. Loughner, who killed six people in an assassination attempt on former Representative Gabrielle Giffords — pleaded guilty in exchange for a sentence of life in prison, with no chance of parole.

But here she faces one of her toughest challenges yet: trying to spare the life of a reviled defendant in a case that traumatized and enraged the nation, while federal prosecutors appear determined to put Mr. Tsarnaev to death.

In past defenses, Clarke has emphasized her clients’ personal histories to humanize them, the Times reported:

It is during the sentencing phase that Ms. Clarke would make her case to spare Mr. Tsarnaev’s life. Typically, her strategy is to burrow deeply into her clients’ backgrounds, down to details like their prenatal medical history, to humanize them and help a jury understand what led them to such horrific acts.

The Associated Press in 2013 described Clarke as a “defender of the despised.” In a speech reported by the AP, Clarke voiced her opposition to the death penalty, which federal prosecutors are seeking for Tsarnaev.

“I got a dose of understanding human behavior and I learned what the death penalty does to us,” Clarke said. “I don’t think it’s a secret that I oppose the death penalty.”

“The first clear way death cases are different is the clients,” she added. “Most have suffered from serious severe trauma, unbelievable trauma. We know that from brain research. Many suffer from severe cognitive development issues that affect the core of their being.”

Clarke appears to be taking a similar approach to the Tsarnaev trial. She reportedly plans to characterize Tsarnaev, who was 19 at the time of the bombing and held no criminal record, as manipulated into the attack by his older brother. The Times suggested this strategy will likely focus on Tsarnaev’s sentence — and specifically on preventing the death penalty.

Policy
Is Trump’s Justice Department trying to discredit itself?Is Trump’s Justice Department trying to discredit itself?
Policy

The DOJ used to avoid spectacles like the Louise Lucas raid.

By Ian Millhiser
Politics
What the Supreme Court still has left to decide this termWhat the Supreme Court still has left to decide this term
Politics

Democracy and Donald Trump dominate the Court’s remaining docket.

By Ian Millhiser
Politics
The Supreme Court seems a bit nervous about letting the police track you with your phoneThe Supreme Court seems a bit nervous about letting the police track you with your phone
Politics

The justices were concerned that the Trump administration is asking for too much in a major police surveillance case.

By Ian Millhiser
Politics
The Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track youThe Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track you
Politics

Chatrie v. United States asks what limits the Constitution places on the surveillance state in an age of cellphones.

By Ian Millhiser
Policy
Pam Bondi’s ouster makes Trump’s Justice Department even more dangerousPam Bondi’s ouster makes Trump’s Justice Department even more dangerous
Policy

The best thing about Bondi was her incompetence.

By Ian Millhiser
Culture
Me Too revealed a lot of villains. Why is Epstein the one we still care about?Me Too revealed a lot of villains. Why is Epstein the one we still care about?
Culture

How the Epstein story became an American parable.

By Constance Grady