Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Heads, Paul Ryan wins. Tails, the House Freedom Caucus loses.

Win McNamee/Getty Images

What Paul Ryan has done is very smart: He’s set up a game where if he doesn’t take the speakership, it’s only because he’s proven that no one in their right mind should want the speakership.

In context, Ryan’s conditions — endorsements from all Republican caucuses, rules changes that make it much harder to challenge a speaker midterm, and a lighter travel and fundraising schedule — verge on the ridiculous. He’s demanding the House Freedom Caucus give up its power to do to him what it did to John Boehner even as he promises to be less accommodating than John Boehner.

The idea of the House Freedom Caucus is that the House should be run more, well, freely — their critique of Boehner is that he centralized power in ways that stopped House Republicans from carrying out the conservative will of their people, and their proposed rules changes would decentralize power away from the speaker. But now Ryan is saying he will only take the job if the House Freedom Caucus endorses his effort to further centralize power — a betrayal of everything they stand for.

“What Paul Ryan is asking for is even more power and less responsibility,” Rep. Tim Huelskamp told the National Review. That’s basically right.

You can read Ryan’s demands two ways, and both of them may be right. One reading is that he actually doesn’t want to be speaker, so he’s drafted conditions that ensure he won’t actually have to be speaker. Given that Ryan firmly and repeatedly refused to run for the position and only reconsidered after massive pressure from his colleagues, that seems the likeliest explanation — these conditions let Ryan avoid the speakership but put the blame on the House Freedom Caucus.

The other way to read the demands is Ryan is trying to split the House Freedom Caucus by testing what their insurgency was really about in the first place. Boehner, though a well-liked figured in the conference, wasn’t considered an ideological warrior in the way Ryan is. While some conservatives believe Ryan has been tainted by fame and establishment acceptance in recent years — they liked Ryan before he was cool, man — there are plenty who still idolize the man who reoriented the Republican Party around budgets that privatize Medicare, block grant Medicaid, and take a chainsaw to discretionary spending. Many of them might have opposed Boehner without ever expecting him to resign — they wanted to be heard by the regime, not to overturn it. Like the dog that caught the car, some of them may not even really be sure what a good-enough outcome of their insurgency would be, and they may be looking for a way out; Ryan is giving them that way.

But Ryan could find himself with a bit of a dog-that-caught-the-car problem, too. He’s demanding across-the-board endorsements from major Republican caucuses. “If I can truly be a unifying figure, then I will gladly serve,” Ryan told reporters. Anything less, he said, and “I’ll be happy to stay where I am at the Ways and Means Committee.”

The problem is that even if Ryan gets the job, he won’t be a truly unifying figure. He will have steamrolled the House Freedom Caucus, and he’ll still have to carry out all the divisive tasks that have so ruined Boehner’s reputation. Ryan will have to pass a debt ceiling bill, and he’ll have to pass spending bills that keep the government open, and he’ll have to tell conservatives that the fights they want to pick often aren’t fights they can win.

Tea Party conservatives were frequently angry at Boehner, but they weren’t really disappointed in him — they didn’t see him as truly one of them, and they hadn’t given up anything to power his ascent. With Ryan, however, the disappointment will curdle into betrayal — he was one of them, he was the best of them, and they gave him extraordinary concessions just to take the job. When he turns out to be a lot like Boehner on substance — an absolute inevitability — the backlash will be fierce.

Ryan should hope he doesn’t get the job. The problem for House Republicans is that if Ryan doesn’t get the job, he will have shown no one else should want the job, either.

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters