Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Carly Fiorina’s wildly misleading “92 percent” claim about women and jobs

Carly Fiorina made an incredible-sounding claim about Barack Obama’s presidency at the CNBC debate Wednesday night: that nearly all jobs lost during his first term belonged to women.

Answering a question about equal pay, Fiorina claimed, “Ninety-two percent of the jobs lost during Barack Obama’s first term belonged to women.”

If that seems hard to believe, it’s because it’s not true. Fiorina repeated a claim Mitt Romney made during his 2012 presidential run, which PolitiFact rated “mostly false.” Romney’s campaign objected to the rating at the time, but PolitiFact stood by its original piece.

What’s more, the Romney figure is also badly out of date, and doesn’t capture what actually happened to women in Obama’s first term at all.

The 92 percent figure is badly cherry-picked

The 92 percent figure first surfaced in April 2012, when a Romney spokesperson tweeted that Obama was “clueless” because he “touts policies for women,” yet women accounted for 92.3 percent of the jobs lost in his administration. Romney’s website also hosted the claim. And the 92 percent figure was true at the time; between January 2009 and March 2012 (the time Obama had been in office), women really did account for the vast majority of jobs lost.

PolitiFact, however, argued that this was a hugely misleading read of job numbers: “First, Obama cannot be held entirely accountable for the employment picture on the day he took office, just as he could not be given credit if times had been booming. Second, by choosing figures from January 2009, months into the recession, the statement ignored the millions of jobs lost before then, when most of the job loss fell on men.”

Economists told PolitiFact that this is a typical pattern for recessions: Men often lose their jobs first and hardest, because they’re in more vulnerable industries like manufacturing and construction.

If you look at the numbers from the beginning of the recession in 2007 through March 2012 (when Romney’s original analysis cut off), women only lost 39.7 percent of the jobs.

It’s worth noting that focusing on Obama’s first term ignores the many jobs that both genders gained in Obama’s second term, as the chart above shows. Romney couldn’t have known that in 2012, of course, but Fiorina should have known better in 2015.

The bigger problem with the 92 percent figure: It’s not even accurate anymore

This is the danger of citing statistics that are more than three years out of date.

The 92 percent figure that Fiorina reused was calculated before the end of Obama’s first term. And that makes sense, given that it hadn’t ended yet.

Now, in 2015, we can look at the entirety of Obama’s first term in office. When you do that, you actually see a net job gain for women of about 400,000 jobs.

All of this, by the way, was actually a convoluted attack on Hillary Clinton. Fiorina started off her equal pay answer this way: “It is the height of hypocrisy for Mrs. Clinton to talk about being the first woman president when every single policy she espouses, and every single policy of President Obama, has been demonstrably bad for women.”

It’s disingenuous to attack Hillary Clinton based on the unique economic circumstances and policies of Obama’s first term, as Fiorina did during her answer. It’s even more disingenuous to say that Obama’s policies were bad for women based on this one misleading statistic, which ignores forces that were set in motion before Obama became president and doesn’t even paint a complete picture of his first term.

The third Republican debate, in 2 minutes

The GOP debate was two hours long. Here it is in 2 minutes.

Posted by Vox on Wednesday, October 28, 2015
See More:

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters