Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Survey: Most Americans agree death penalty may kill innocent people — but still support it

Most supporters of the death penalty agree with one of the major arguments against it, according to a new survey by the Pew Research Center.

The survey of 1,500 US adults, conducted in March, found that nearly two-thirds of Americans who favor the death penalty agree there’s a risk it will kill innocent people — one of the major reasons some Americans oppose capital punishment.

Nearly half of death penalty supporters also said it doesn’t deter crime. But nearly six in 10 said minorities aren’t more likely to be sentenced to death, when in reality they are executed at higher rates.

So why do Americans support the death penalty? Previous Gallup surveys have given a consistent justification: vengeance. In 2014, 35 percent of those in favor of the death penalty for convicted murderers said a variation of “it fits the crime,” “eye for an eye,” or “they took a life,” while 14 percent said “they deserve it.” Another 14 percent said the death penalty saves money — even though lengthy court appeals make it more expensive than life in prison. Just 6 percent said it deters crime.

The Pew survey also found that support for the death penalty is decreasing — although the issue, like many others, is getting much more polarized by political party affiliation, with Democrats growing more opposed as Republicans remain in strong support. There was a 37-point gap in support for the death penalty between Republicans and Democrats in 2015, compared to a 16-point gap in 1996.

Further reading:


Correction: The key in the chart was originally incorrect.

Policy
Is Trump’s Justice Department trying to discredit itself?Is Trump’s Justice Department trying to discredit itself?
Policy

The DOJ used to avoid spectacles like the Louise Lucas raid.

By Ian Millhiser
Politics
What the Supreme Court still has left to decide this termWhat the Supreme Court still has left to decide this term
Politics

Democracy and Donald Trump dominate the Court’s remaining docket.

By Ian Millhiser
Politics
The Supreme Court seems a bit nervous about letting the police track you with your phoneThe Supreme Court seems a bit nervous about letting the police track you with your phone
Politics

The justices were concerned that the Trump administration is asking for too much in a major police surveillance case.

By Ian Millhiser
Politics
The Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track youThe Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track you
Politics

Chatrie v. United States asks what limits the Constitution places on the surveillance state in an age of cellphones.

By Ian Millhiser
Policy
Pam Bondi’s ouster makes Trump’s Justice Department even more dangerousPam Bondi’s ouster makes Trump’s Justice Department even more dangerous
Policy

The best thing about Bondi was her incompetence.

By Ian Millhiser
Culture
Me Too revealed a lot of villains. Why is Epstein the one we still care about?Me Too revealed a lot of villains. Why is Epstein the one we still care about?
Culture

How the Epstein story became an American parable.

By Constance Grady