Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

New WikiLeaks documents reveal the inner workings of the Dr. Oz Show

Dr. Mehmet Oz often appears on his popular show to promote new health products and devices. Most viewers are likely under the impression that he's doing this because he's closely considered their merits and decided the products are widely beneficial.

But newly leaked emails suggest that business considerations — not health or science — can be a driving factor in which products Oz decides to promote.

Last week, WikiLeaks released a series of emails sent between Dr. Oz, his staff, and executives at Sony (one of his show’s producers). They shed some light on how Dr. Oz’s daily talk show works behind the scenes.

Dr. Oz talks about promoting the products of Sony, one of his show’s producers

In a January 2014 email, for instance, Dr. Oz reaches out to Michael Lynton, the CEO of Sony Entertainment, about his interest in wearable fitness and health tracking devices.

“I have been carefully following the wearable device market and am pretty close to consummating a longer term relationship, but just saw the piece below quoting Kaz Hirai [the president and CEO of Sony] and realized that Sony is moving into the space as well,” Oz writes in an email. “We should leverage the Sony-driven success of our TV show into other arenas where Sony thrives, like health hardware.”
The email suggests Dr. Oz is planning to use his platform on the show to help expand Sony’s fitness and health tracking devices market. Oz doesn’t mention health considerations. He mostly seems excited about the business synergy with Sony, one of the producers of his show.

It’s worth recalling that Oz has built a massive international audience as a man of medicine, even trademarking the moniker “America’s Doctor.” But the Sony correspondence suggests that behind the scenes, Oz is often concerned with more than just the health of his viewers — there’s also the financial health of one of the show’s producers to consider.

Emails show both Sony and Oz’s staff are worried about Oz’s growing critics

There were also a number of revealing emails about Oz’s testimony before a Senate commerce subcommittee hearing last June, during which Sen. Claire McCaskill admonished Oz for promoting bogus health claims.
One email suggested Sony was concerned the hearing might compromise future business prospects around Oz.

In this correspondence, Keith Weaver, ‎executive vice president for worldwide government affairs at Sony, writes: “Dr. Oz has not entered into a paid sponsorship arrangement to date, but would like to explore doing so in the future. We have apprised the appropriate parties of the risks associated with the future plans, as well as specific criticisms of Dr. Oz’s role in the national conversation about health that could emerge in the hearing or in subsequent coverage.”

Dr. Oz sounds a lot different under oath than he does on his TV show. Subscribe to Vox on YouTube.

Other documents revealed that representatives of the Dr. Oz Show met with McCaskill's office before Oz's appearance at the hearing. Those staffers weighed whether Oz should make the appearance. According to one email, it was Oz who pushed to appear despite concerns at another of the show's producers, Harpo, about the potential negative public relations fallout.

“It’s also worth noting for the record that Harpo’s counsel is not in favor of Oz participating, especially when he’s not legally obligated to do so,” wrote Denise Beaudoin, the legal and business affairs counsel to The Dr. Oz Show, in an email. “They do not see the value of getting involved unless compelled by subpoena because there’s always the potential for downside (no matter how slight).”

Other WikiLeaks emails showed that Oz’s PR team was worried about any publicity that could make the TV star look like a charlatan at a time when he was already under fire.
As Sheraton Kalouria, chief marketing officer at Sony Pictures Television, wrote in an email, “We feel we should not give the media who looks at Oz like [a] snake oil salesman right now any fodder to further this perception.”
In a phone conversation on Sunday night, Oz declined to answer Vox’s questions about the specifics of the emails.

More in Culture

Life
What is an aging face supposed to look like?What is an aging face supposed to look like?
Life

When bodies and appearances are malleable, what does that mean for the person underneath?

By Allie Volpe
Video
What would J.R.R. Tolkien think of Palantir?What would J.R.R. Tolkien think of Palantir?
Play
Video

How The Lord of the Rings lore helps explain the mysterious tech company.

By Benjamin Stephen
Climate
The climate crisis is coming for your groceriesThe climate crisis is coming for your groceries
Climate

Extreme heat is already wiping out soy, coffee, berries, and Christmas trees. Farm animals and humans are suffering too.

By Ayurella Horn-Muller
Future Perfect
The surprisingly strong case for feeling great about your coffee habitThe surprisingly strong case for feeling great about your coffee habit
Future Perfect

Your morning coffee is one of modern life’s underrated miracles.

By Bryan Walsh
Good Medicine
Do health influencers actually know what they’re talking about?Do health influencers actually know what they’re talking about?
Good Medicine

Most health influencers don’t have real credentials — but they are more influential than ever.

By Dylan Scott
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North