Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

The Daily Show brought back some of its most bizarre guests. They stood by their comments.

The Daily Show has hosted some bizarre guests in its on-the-field pieces during Jon Stewart’s tenure — from racists and homophobes to a prominent pastor who said President Barack Obama is Adolf Hitler. For many viewers, the bizarre comments have raised the question: Are these people real?

Last night, Stewart sat down with Jessica Williams, a correspondent of the show, to get some answers. It all seemed to come down to one thing, Williams explained: “They are real, and they do know who we are, and they don’t care because we bring a camera with us.”

But would these former guests stick to their controversial comments if given another opportunity? Williams followed up with some of the guests to find out.

“You’re doubling down on what you said six years ago?”

The Daily Show/Comedy Central

Take, for instance, James David Manning, the ATLAH World Missionary Church chief pastor who previously equated Obama with Hitler.

“The things that he has accomplished are ultra evil,” Manning said. “It takes a certain amount of evil spirit and demented, if you will, personality to do what he has done.”

“I’m just trying to get this right,” Williams replied. “You’re doubling down on what you said six years ago?”

“You could say that, yes,” Manning responded. “I’m leaning more toward Obama being like the son of Satan.”

Williams said this was the typical response to her follow-up to field guests: Most people didn’t just stand by their comments, they were actually happy that they had appeared on The Daily Show.

“I understood when you asked me to be on the show exactly what it was going to be about,” Manning said. “It was going to be an attempt to make my ideas seem buffoonery. But I agreed to do it anyway, because I didn’t think you would succeed at it. And you didn’t.”

Watch: Why The Daily Show had to change

See More:

More in Culture

Life
What is an aging face supposed to look like?What is an aging face supposed to look like?
Life

When bodies and appearances are malleable, what does that mean for the person underneath?

By Allie Volpe
Video
What would J.R.R. Tolkien think of Palantir?What would J.R.R. Tolkien think of Palantir?
Play
Video

How The Lord of the Rings lore helps explain the mysterious tech company.

By Benjamin Stephen
Climate
The climate crisis is coming for your groceriesThe climate crisis is coming for your groceries
Climate

Extreme heat is already wiping out soy, coffee, berries, and Christmas trees. Farm animals and humans are suffering too.

By Ayurella Horn-Muller
Future Perfect
The surprisingly strong case for feeling great about your coffee habitThe surprisingly strong case for feeling great about your coffee habit
Future Perfect

Your morning coffee is one of modern life’s underrated miracles.

By Bryan Walsh
Good Medicine
Do health influencers actually know what they’re talking about?Do health influencers actually know what they’re talking about?
Good Medicine

Most health influencers don’t have real credentials — but they are more influential than ever.

By Dylan Scott
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North