Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Mike Huckabee: The point of the military is to “kill people and break things”

Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee doesn’t think transgender soldiers should be allowed to serve openly in the military because the military is meant to “kill people and break things,” not serve as “a social experiment.”

Update: Coverage of the second Republican debate.

“I’m not sure how paying for transgender surgery for soldiers, sailors, airmen, Marines makes our country safer,” Huckabee said.

The problem with Huckabee’s argument is that the question isn’t whether trans soldiers should serve, but whether they should be allowed to serve openly. And there’s some evidence that not letting trans soldiers get the gender-affirming treatments they need can lead to mental health issues that can then cause problems in the field.

About 15,500 trans people serve in the military, according to the Williams Institute, an LGBTQ think tank. These troops are forced into hiding. As a result, many can’t get treatments for their gender dysphoria, a state of emotional distress caused by how the gender someone was designated at birth conflicts with their gender identity. This condition doesn’t affect all trans people, but for some it can lead to severe depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation.

So all trans soldiers could potentially serve without problems if they were allowed to do so openly and got the care they need. But by blocking access to that care, the military risks pushing trans people into hiding and stops the treatment and prevention of mental health issues that can lead to actual problems when they’re on duty.

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters