Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

5 years later, Jon Stewart’s talk with 9/11 first responders is still incredibly powerful

Brad Barket/Getty Images

Five years ago, Jon Stewart hosted four 9/11 first responders on The Daily Show to talk about Congress’s inability at the time to approve a health program that helps treat injuries sustained during their work at ground zero. Now a retired Stewart is set to make the same plea to Congress next week.

“We represent the brothers and sisters that were down there,” John Devlin, a New York City–based operating engineer of heavy equipment, said in 2010. “This isn’t a ‘me, me’ to any one of us. This is about the brothers and sisters that can’t come out and speak like we can.”

The James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act became law in January 2011, spending $4.3 billion over five years in monitoring, care, and compensation for people who worked or lived near the site of the 9/11 attacks. The bill funds health care for tens of thousands of cops, firefighters, and EMTs who suffered injuries and illnesses, including nearly 4,400 with cancer, as a result of their work at ground zero. (As the Atlantic’s Aria Bendix reported, studies have only recently found a hard link between health issues and 9/11 — but first responders have reported an unusual number of diseases, including cancer.)

But parts of the law are set to expire by the end of the month and next year — and beneficiaries are worried that will actually happen due to fights over the law’s costs.

In response, Stewart — who’s been credited with helping the law pass the first time around — plans to lead 100 first responders through the halls of Congress next week to get legislators to act. But in a highly dysfunctional Congress, it’s unclear whether that will be enough.

Watch: Why The Daily Show had to change

More in Politics

Podcasts
Why the anti-abortion movement is disappointed in TrumpWhy the anti-abortion movement is disappointed in Trump
Podcast
Podcasts

Trump helped overturn Roe. Anti-abortion advocates still aren’t happy.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
A year of Trump is backfiring on the religious rightA year of Trump is backfiring on the religious right
Politics

Americans don’t really want “Christian nationalism.”

By Christian Paz
Politics
The real reason Americans hate the economy so muchThe real reason Americans hate the economy so much
Politics

Did decades of low inflation make the public far more unforgiving when it finally did surge?

By Andrew Prokop
Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp