Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

President Obama just knocked the media’s 2008 coverage of Hillary Clinton. Here’s why.

President Barack Obama with Hillary Clinton in September 2012.
President Barack Obama with Hillary Clinton in September 2012.
President Barack Obama with Hillary Clinton in September 2012.
Official White House Photo by Lawrence Jackson

President Barack Obama just agreed with something long alleged by Hillary Clinton supporters: The media scrutinized her more than Obama in the 2008 Democratic primary, an imbalance that favored Obama’s campaign.

“There were times where I think the media probably was a little unfair to her and tilted a little my way in the — in calling her out when she was tough and not calling some of our folks out as much when we were tough in ads,” Obama told Politico’s Glenn Thrush in an interview published Monday.

While not offering a formal endorsement, Obama extensively praised Clinton in the interview.

His comments could prove helpful to his former secretary of state, who is back in Iowa, this time running neck and neck with Bernie Sanders.

Obama says his 2008 campaign was too dismissive of the Clinton campaign’s “legitimate questions”

In 2008, Obama’s team rejected questions about his preparedness for the presidency, and his campaign dismissed Clinton’s infamous 3 am “ringing phone” ad as a scare tactic.

After nearly two terms of serving in the White House, however, Obama gave a different assessment of the issues raised by the Clinton campaign.

“The truth is in 2007 and 2008, sometimes my supporters and my staff, I think, got too huffy about what were legitimate questions she was raising,” Obama said in the Politico interview.

There are two main contexts for understanding Obama’s apparent change in tone.

One, of course, is that Obama has spent seven years in the Oval Office and now has an added appreciation for the complexity and rigor of the job.

Another is that the president made the remarks during a Politico interview in which he was signaling support for Clinton in an increasingly close Democratic nomination race.

Obama called Clinton a disciplined, thoughtful leader who “knows every policy inside and out” and can “start here, [on] day one.”

Acknowledging the validity of the Clinton campaign’s “legitimate questions” for Obama in 2008 may be one way of suggesting the legitimacy of posing similar questions to Bernie Sanders, whose foreign policy expertise has come under similar scrutiny in 2016.

Obama and Clinton during the 2008 election. (Jae C. Hong-Pool/Getty Images)

Obama says Clinton had a “tougher job” than he did in the 2008 campaign

In extolling Clinton, Obama didn’t just validate the idea that the media helped his candidacy over hers: He also said she had to work harder, for less credit, than he did — a double standard for women Clinton herself has pointed out before.

“She had to do everything that I had to do, except, like Ginger Rogers, backwards in heels,” Obama said in the interview, published on Monday.

“She had to wake up earlier than I did because she had to get her hair done. She had to, you know, handle all the expectations that were placed on her.”

As Sanders rises in the polls, pundits have been increasingly speculating that Clinton will collapse from her commanding position as the frontrunner, as she did against Obama.

But in the Politico interview, Obama stressed how easily the 2008 race could have gone the other way.

In talking about Clinton’s strengths in 2016, in other words, Obama took care to minimize her weaknesses in 2008.

“She had a tougher job throughout that primary than I did and, you know, she was right there the entire time,” he said. “And had things gone a little bit different in some states or if the sequence of primaries and caucuses been a little different, she could have easily won.”


Be sure to subscribe to Vox on YouTube for more explainer videos.

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters