Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

There will be a noticeably empty seat at the State of the Union this year. Here’s why.

First lady Michelle Obama (R) hugs Cleopatra Cowley-Pendleton (C) and Nathaniel A. Pendleton Sr. (L) of Chicago, Illinois before President Obama’s State of the Union speech at the US Capitol February 13, 2013, in Washington, DC.
First lady Michelle Obama (R) hugs Cleopatra Cowley-Pendleton (C) and Nathaniel A. Pendleton Sr. (L) of Chicago, Illinois before President Obama’s State of the Union speech at the US Capitol February 13, 2013, in Washington, DC.
First lady Michelle Obama (R) hugs Cleopatra Cowley-Pendleton (C) and Nathaniel A. Pendleton Sr. (L) of Chicago, Illinois before President Obama’s State of the Union speech at the US Capitol February 13, 2013, in Washington, DC.
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

It’s a longstanding tradition for the first lady to invite several lucky guests to sit in her box for the State of the Union. They’re typically ridiculously high achievers and individuals whose life stories illustrate a major point the president is trying to make.

This year, the White House has only announced one guest so far – and it’s an empty seat.

During a call with gun control supporters, President Barack Obama announced he planned to leave the seat empty to commemorate the lives of gun victims lost and give a voice to those who can no longer speak, according to a White House official.

The White House then announced it on Twitter.

The symbolic move comes on the heels of other gun actions the president took this week. He announced more than 20 executive actions designed to tighten gun sales made without background checks.

And in an op-ed in the New York Times, Obama pledged not to support any candidate, including Democrats, who don’t support further gun restrictions. It’s unclear, however, what this pledge might look like in practice, as Vox’s German Lopez argues:

All the major Democratic presidential candidates back more gun control measures, even Bernie Sanders, who has been a moderate on the issue in the past. It’s possible Obama’s threat applies to some lower-ticket candidates, like those running for the House of Representatives or Senate, but it’s unclear if a Democrat maintaining a timid approach to guns would be in a state in which he or she wants the president to campaign.

Meanwhile, Republican presidential candidate Ted Cruz responded that he would save a seat for his own political cause:


See More:

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters