Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Rudy Giuliani: Democrats commit election fraud because they “control the inner cities”

In most years, what Rudy Giuliani said on Sunday’s morning talk shows could be dismissed as a conspiracy theory with no greater consequence or relevance. But this isn’t most years.

“Dead people generally vote for Democrats instead of Republicans,” Giuliani said on CNN’s State of the Union with Jake Tapper, insinuating that American cities are hotbeds of widespread voter fraud. “If you want me to tell you that I think the elections of Philadelphia and Chicago are going to be fair, I would have to be a moron to say that.”

This is flatly wrong. Despite Giuliani’s dystopian fever dreams, election experts are clear that voter fraud is extraordinary rare, had no impact on the 2012 race, and isn’t expected to be a problem in 2016. As Tapper correctly pointed out, even the Republican Party of Philadelphia agreed that there was no voter fraud in the city.

But the big problem with Giuliani’s comments is not just that they’re factually incorrect. (Does he remember being elected mayor of New York City twice?) It’s that they’re contributing to the dangerous and widespread delegitimization of the electoral process — one that’s being dramatically amplified as we barrel toward Election Day.

Donald Trump, of course, is leading this charge. Trump has already begun warning about a cabal of global elites planning to “rig” the election for Hillary Clinton. Millions of people are primed to believe him: Majorities of independents and Republicans already say they won’t trust the election results regardless of its outcome.

As Vox’s Dara Lind has argued, Trump is breaking with previous Republican nominees by himself voicing and validating these fears. “That raises the possibility of violence on Election Day,” Lind writes. “It certainly lays the groundwork for anger and denial afterward.”

You could imagine a situation in which Trump’s top surrogates refused to go along with this irresponsible storyline. (Just last week, for instance, Giuliani refused to defend Trump’s “grab ‘em by the pussy” comments, admitting that they referred to sexual assault.) If the top members of Trump’s inner circle also disavowed his talk of election rigging, then perhaps it would be a more difficult line for the Republican nominee to maintain.

But Giuliani is doing just the opposite. Not only did the former New York City mayor affirm the Trump talk of election rigging, he took it further — arguing that it would be ludicrous for him not to expect voter fraud on November 8.

Here’s what Giuliani said on CNN (you can see the barely veiled disgust on Tapper’s face in the video above):

GIULIANI: I remember when I was in Chicago, there were 720 dead people voted in the 1982 election … We have people who cheat in elections.

TAPPER: You’re saying only Democrats cheat.

GIULIANI: I have found few situations where Republicans cheat. They don’t control the inner cities the way Democrats do. Maybe if Republicans controlled the inner cities, they’d do as much cheating.TAPPER: I think there are a lot of election experts that would have very strong disagreements with you.

GIULIANI: Well, then they’ve never prosecuted election fraud … I can’t sit here and tell you they don’t cheat, and I can tell you it’s because they control the polling stations … So they leave dead people on the rolls and pay people to have those dead people vote.So there you have it. Giuliani isn’t exactly coming out and saying outright that minorities in inner cities will be used to steal the election for Hillary Clinton. He’s just saying that, in his experience, lots of dead people vote in “inner cities,” and that most of the inner cities are controlled by Democrats, and that he saw election fraud happen once in Chicago 34 years ago. The aftermath of the election should be interesting.

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters