Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Newt Gingrich melts down on Fox over Trump spiral, calls Megyn Kelly “fascinated with sex”

Newt Gingrich and Megyn Kelly got into an explosive debate on Fox News Tuesday night as two parallel universes within the Republican Party collided in real time on live television.

Gingrich blamed Fox News for Donald Trump’s slide in the polls, saying the media has an unfair, unrelenting focus on his sex life and that Kelly has a “fascination with sex.”

Kelly pointed out that it was Trump himself who set the scandal in motion when his voice was heard on tape saying he likes to “grab ‘em by the pussy.” There was then a subsequent flurry of sexual assault accusations from more than a dozen women.

Here’s the full exchange between Kelly and Gingrich. Kelly began by asking Gingrich if Trump is a “sexual predator,” prompting Gingrich to erupt in anger:

GINGRICH: He’s not a sexual predator!

KELLY: Okay, I’m not saying that — that’s your opinion.
GINGRICH: You cannot defend that statement. I’m sick and tired of people like you using language that’s inflammatory that’s not true! I think that is exactly the bias that people are upset by!
KELLY: Excuse me, Mr. Speaker, you have no idea if that’s true or not.
GINGRICH: Neither do you!
KELLY: That’s right. … I think that your defensiveness on this may speak volumes, sir. … If Donald Trump is a sexual predator, then it’s a big story. And what we saw on that tape was Trump himself saying that he likes to grab women by the genitals and kiss them against their will.
That’s what we saw. Then we saw 10 women come forward after he actually denied doing it at a debate, to say: “That was untrue; He did it to me; he did it to me.” We saw reporters, we saw people who had worked with him, people from Apprentice, and so on and so forth. He denies it all, which is his right — we don’t know what the truth is.
GINGRICH: You are fascinated with sex and you don’t care about public policy! And that’s what I get out of watching you tonight.

Gingrich: “We’re living in two alternate universes”

The segment began with Kelly asking Gingrich, a Trump supporter, if nominating Trump had been a mistake. Gingrich refused to recognize that Trump looks headed for a lopsided defeat.

Kelly proceeded to tick off all the overwhelming evidence that Hillary Clinton is both ahead and increasing her lead, and Gingrich essentially dismissed it as not trustworthy. That eventually put Gingrich in the position of suggesting that Fox News, where he is a paid contributor, is a part of the “establishment” whose polling of the election cannot be trusted:

GINGRICH: The next two weeks are a contest of two parallel universes … Republicans are actually outvoting Democrats in Florida; they’re outvoting Democrats in Pennsylvania. That is unprecedented.
KELLY: Really? You think Trump is going to win Pennsylvania?
GINGRICH: I think he might. All I can report to you right now is they’re outvoting the Democrats right now in Pennsylvania.
KELLY: But all the polls put her ahead in Pennsylvania.
GINGRICH: I know, I just told you, we’re living in two alternate universes.
KELLY: All of the moves on this map over the last three weeks — by Cook, by Larry Sabato, by the Fox News Decision Desk — show the country moving left. These are nonpartisan outlets just trying to call the scoreboard.
GINGRICH: These aren’t “nonpartisan” outlets. Everything you described is part of the establishment.
KELLY: Fox News? Really? I don’t think so.
GINGRICH: Oh, come on.

Update: On Wednesday morning, Gingrich responded with the comeback he evidently wished he could have thought of at the time:

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters