Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Grammys 2016: Lady Gaga’s David Bowie tribute was too busy to do him justice

Alex Abad-Santos
Alex Abad-Santos is a senior correspondent who explains what society obsesses over, from Marvel and movies to fitness and skin care. He came to Vox in 2014. Prior to that, he worked at The Atlantic.

The nicest thing I can say about Lady Gaga’s Grammys tribute to David Bowie is that I fully believe Gaga believes it was a tribute. She sang David Bowie songs. She dressed in David Bowie costumes. She sounded really good.

But still, the tribute felt a little messy and chaotic.

The main problem was that Gaga attempted to squeeze in too many songs. She started off beautifully with “Space Oddity,” but as she segued from hit to hit — like when she began to sing “Rebel Rebel,” for example — the changes in tone and her performance became distracting. She was running across the stage, vamping all over the place (she basically looked like an Elvis impostor while singing “Fashion”), and her kinetic energy made the performance feel more like Rocky Horror Picture Show or Monster Mash than a tribute to Bowie. Picture a drag version of a Bowie performance, as opposed to an actual Bowie performance.

That’s not to say there weren’t pockets of greatness, like certain riffs in Gaga’s rendition of “Heroes,” or her energy in “Rebel Rebel.” But compressing all of Bowie’s hits into one performance didn’t allow Gaga to really do them justice, nor did it allow us to appreciate them.

See More:

More in Culture

Life
What is an aging face supposed to look like?What is an aging face supposed to look like?
Life

When bodies and appearances are malleable, what does that mean for the person underneath?

By Allie Volpe
Video
What would J.R.R. Tolkien think of Palantir?What would J.R.R. Tolkien think of Palantir?
Play
Video

How The Lord of the Rings lore helps explain the mysterious tech company.

By Benjamin Stephen
Climate
The climate crisis is coming for your groceriesThe climate crisis is coming for your groceries
Climate

Extreme heat is already wiping out soy, coffee, berries, and Christmas trees. Farm animals and humans are suffering too.

By Ayurella Horn-Muller
Future Perfect
The surprisingly strong case for feeling great about your coffee habitThe surprisingly strong case for feeling great about your coffee habit
Future Perfect

Your morning coffee is one of modern life’s underrated miracles.

By Bryan Walsh
Good Medicine
Do health influencers actually know what they’re talking about?Do health influencers actually know what they’re talking about?
Good Medicine

Most health influencers don’t have real credentials — but they are more influential than ever.

By Dylan Scott
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North