Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

How a too-clever attempt to oppose women in combat turned into a bill opening the draft to women

A Republican congress member from California tried to make a point about women in the military, and it backfired.

Amid the debate about the Pentagon announcing it would allow qualified women in combat roles, Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-CA) proposed to amend a defense bill to also require 18- to 26-year-old women to register for Selective Service, more commonly known as the draft.

“Right now draft is sexist,” Hunter said, proposing the amendment to the defense authorization bill to point out that if people didn’t want women to be drafted, they shouldn’t be in combat roles. Hunter himself both opposes allowing women in combat, and does not think it is a good idea to require women to register for the draft.

But to his surprise, members of the legislature from both sides of the aisle said women should be required to register for the draft.

“I actually think if we want equality in this country, if we want women to be treated precisely like men are treated and that they should not be discriminated against, we should be willing to support a universal conscription,” Rep. Jackie Speier (D-CA) said.

The committee voted to include Hunter’s amendment, 32 to 30.

The law that requires only men to register for the draft was upheld in the Supreme Court in 1981, largely because at the time the Department of Defense did not allow women in combat. Now that that has changed, Rep. Chris Gibson (R-NY) joined the Democrats to argue for universally “standards-based” draft — making the language surrounding Selective Service consistent with changes in combat policies.

Last December, the Department of Defense announced the military would open all combat roles to women. However, the historic policy change did not address whether or not the United States military would require women to register for the draft — something that is up to members of Congress.

Hunter never intended for the amendment to pass the committee; while introducing it, he described the graphic nature of front lines, to which, he said, women should not be exposed.

Hunter voted against his own amendment.


See More:

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters