Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

A history of America doing nothing in response to mass shootings

Zack Beauchamp
Zack Beauchamp is a senior correspondent at Vox, where he covers ideology and challenges to democracy, both at home and abroad. His book on democracy, The Reactionary Spirit, was published 0n July 16. You can purchase it here.

After 20 children were murdered at Sandy Hook, we said never again. And then we did absolutely nothing and let another 998 mass shootings happen.

After every national high-profile shooting, there are murmurs that this time, surely, is the event that will make us do something — anything — to stop a future attack like this one. But each time, ideas about how to stop gun violence stall.

As we process news of the worst mass shooting in American history at the Pulse gay nightclub in Orlando, let’s not forget the warnings we had, and did not heed.

  • December 2012, Sandy Hook: The Sandy Hook shooting, which claimed the lives of seven adults and 20 first-graders, prompted the most significant push for gun law reform since the 1990s. A relatively weak background-check bill, supported by the Obama administration, was filibustered to death in the Senate, failing by a six vote threshold in April 2013. A bill to revive the expired federal assault weapons ban also failed, by a much wider margin.
  • May 2014, Isla Vista: Just days before the shooting, in which misogynist Elliot Rodger killed seven people at UC-Santa Barbara, Sen. Ed Markey introduced a bill that would provide $10 million to the Centers for Disease Control to study the causes of and solutions to gun violence. Currently, the CDC is blocked from compiling data on gun violence due to Republican fears that the research would lend support for gun control measures. Markey’s bill went nowhere, even after Rodger’s rampage.
  • June 2015, Charleston: White supremacist Dylann Roof shot up a historically black church, killing nine people. Afterwards, Rep. James Clyburn introduced a bill to reform the background check process, which currently allows firearm dealers to sell guns within three days if they haven’t heard anything from the FBI. Clyburn’s bill, once again, went nowhere.
  • October 2015, Roseburg: After nine people died at, yet again, a college campus, President Barak Obama gave a famously angry address to the nation calling for gun law reform. Obama pointed to the UK and Australia — which have restricted gun purchasing and even, in Australia’s case, actually seized guns from their owners — for policy ideas. “It cannot be this easy for somebody who wants to inflict harm on other people to get his or her hands on a gun,” he said. There was no meaningful legislative follow-up to Obama’s proposals.
  • December 2015, San Bernardino: A month after Syed Rizwan Farook and Tashfeen Malik murdered 14 people at a San Bernardino center for people with disabilities, the two senators from Connecticut introduced a new gun reform bill. Their bill would repeal a 2005 law that shielded gun manufacturers and sellers from liability lawsuits after shootings. Obama also proposed legislation to bar people on the no-fly list from buying guns, a proposal that wasn’t likely to do much of anything to stop gun violence. Yet even this law, which tapped into broader national fears about terrorism, went nowhere — as, of course, did the more sensible Murphy/Blumenthal bill.

The National Rifle Association, and its allies in Congress, have taken a hard-line position on gun restrictions. They believe that even minor laws designed to make it harder to get firearms, or even to figure out what works to stop gun violence, are unacceptable infringements on individual freedom. They have enough muscle in Congress to make action on gun control impossible.

The rest of us have to live with the consequences.


See More:

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters