Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Russian hackers attacked the DNC looking for dirt on Donald Trump

Two groups believed to have ties to Russian intelligence services sniffed around the DNC’s computers for more than a year.

Donald Trump Delivers Speech In Manchester, New Hamoshire
Donald Trump Delivers Speech In Manchester, New Hamoshire
Darren McCollester/Getty Images

Russian government hackers broke into the Democratic National Committee’s computer network looking for opposition research on Donald Trump, the Washington Post reports.

DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz acknowledged the breach and said the party sought the help of security firm CrowdStrike to kick out the intruders and secure the system.

“The security of our system is critical to our operation and to the confidence of the campaigns and state parties we work with,” Wasserman Schultz said in a statement. “When we discovered the intrusion, we treated this like the serious incident it is and reached out to CrowdStrike immediately.”

Two sophisticated groups of hackers — dubbed Cozy Bear and Fancy Bear by CrowdStrike — broke into the DNC’s network, with one team rooting around, reading emails and rifling through files since last summer.

Both groups, apparently acting independently, are known to engage in political and economic espionage and are believed to have ties to the Russian government’s intelligence services, CrowdStrike said.

“Our team considers them some of the best adversaries out of all the numerous nation-state, criminal and hacktivist/terrorist groups we encounter on a daily basis,” CrowdStrike said in a report detailing breach.

The Post reported that the Russian hackers were searching for opposition research on the Republican party’s presumptive nominee.

CrowdStrike didn’t go that far — but noted that nation-state actors eager for insights into the U.S. election and the candidates for the White House will do these sorts of deeds.

“The 2016 presidential election has the world’s attention, and leaders of other states are anxiously watching and planning for possible outcomes,” CrowdStrike said in a report. “Attacks against electoral candidates and the parties they represent are likely to continue up until the election in November.”

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

See More:

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh