Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

The DNC says it was hacked by Russians. Trump says the Democrats “hacked” themselves.

Branden Camp/Getty Images

A report detailing the Democratic National Committee’s opposition research on Donald Trump and the party’s general election attack plan was leaked this week. The DNC confirmed Tuesday that its computer network was hacked.

Or was it?

Trump raised suspicion over the DNC’s alleged hack Wednesday, insinuating that the Democratic Party and leader Debbie Wasserman Schultz might have just wanted to release the opposition research in full to sully his name.

“Maybe they weren’t hacked; maybe they just want to get it out there,” Trump said in an interview with Greta Van Susteren on Fox News Wednesday night, inciting yet another conspiracy about the Democratic Party’s underlying motives.

While it’s not unusual for Trump to make vague insinuations about his opposition (this week he also said President Barack Obama may “get” the Orlando shooting “better than anybody understands,” whatever that means), his comments signal the start of what will undoubtedly be a dynamic general election.

The DNC says it was Russian hackers. Trump doesn’t buy it.

Security experts and DNC officials say the Russian government was behind the leak, which compromised the systems so severely that hackers were also able to gain access to emails and internal messages, the Washington Post reported Tuesday.

The officials also said the hack was part of a larger breach of both Hillary Clinton and Trump’s networks, in addition to those of some Republican political groups.

The leaked file — more than 200 pages outlining the presumptive Republican nominees personal history using published reports —highlights the DNC’s plans to attack Trump in the general election, with sections titled “Trump has no core,” and “Trump is a liar.”

But according to Trump, this “hack” was really a calculated move to “distract” the public from Clinton’s flaws.

“We believe it was the DNC that did the ‘hacking’ as a way to distract from the many issues facing their deeply flawed candidate and failed party leader,” Trump said in a Wednesday statement obtained by Politico. “Too bad the DNC doesn’t hack Crooked Hillary’s, 33,000 missing emails.”

“This is all information that has been out there for many years,” he added, “much of it false and/or entirely inaccurate.”


Watch: The political science that predicted Trump’s rise

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters