Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Fox News’s Megyn Kelly unleashed on Donald Trump for his racist attacks on a federal judge

Fox News host Megyn Kelly originally wanted to talk about House Speaker Paul Ryan’s endorsement of Donald Trump. It was supposed to be one of the big segments on her show Thursday night.

Then Trump said a federal judge, Gonzalo Curiel, should be excluded from the Trump University case entirely because of his race and ethnicity. Specifically, Trump argued that Curiel’s “Mexican heritage” and membership in a Hispanic lawyers group presented a “conflict of interest,” since Trump wants to build a wall at the US-Mexico border.

Kelly was clearly livid. She said:

First of all, people are saying that this judge is a member of La Raza, the group that’s been protesting Donald Trump. He isn’t. He’s a member of a Hispanic lawyers association that has no partisan stripes whatsoever. They support Hispanic lawyers and judges. That’s it. So let’s be clear on that.

Secondly, the man is not Mexican. Donald Trump keeps saying he is. He’s American. His parents are Mexican. He’s of Mexican heritage. He was born in Indiana.

Third, he has no conflict of interest, Bill. Now Donald Trump is saying the judge needs to be investigated, someone should look into him. Just because he’s ruled against Donald Trump in this litigation repeatedly — he certified the class, and he denied the motion for summary judgment — that doesn’t make you biased. It doesn’t! …

[The Ryan endorsement] was going to be what we talked about tonight until this news broke moments ago: that Trump continues to attack a sitting federal judge, who, by the way, did a lot to fight the drug cartels when he was a prosecutor, based on his ethnicity, suggesting he has an inherent — inherent! — conflict of interest because of his heritage. “A Hispanic cannot judge a case against me”: that is what Trump is saying — explicitly.

Kelly stopped short of explicitly calling Trump racist. But the presentation was one of the clearest examples I’ve seen yet — on Fox News, no less — of a mainstream media journalist slamming Trump for his racist remarks.


Watch: Donald Trump’s rise is a scary moment in America

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters