Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

The Trump campaign is now blaming Hillary Clinton for Melania’s plagiarism scandal

Viewers of last night’s Republican National Convention speeches were quick to point out strong similarities between a passage in Melania Trump’s remarks and those that first lady Michelle Obama gave during the 2008 Democratic National Convention.

The Trump campaign now says any allegations of plagiarism are “crazy” — and that any attacks Melania has received are the result of her criticizing presumptive Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton.

“Once again, this is an example of when a woman threatens Hillary Clinton, she seeks to demean her and take her down,” Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort said in an early Tuesday morning interview with CNN.

Manafort painted it as absurd that Melania would attempt to plagiarize her remarks given the size of her audience and how many people she knows she would reach.

“She was speaking in front of a crowd of 35 million people last night; she knew that,” Manafort said. “To think that she would be cribbing Michelle Obama’s words is crazy.”

The Trump campaign also released a statement late last night saying that Melania worked with a “team of writers” who “took notes on her life’s inspirations, and in some instances included fragments that reflected their own thinking.”

There are two paragraphs of Melania’s speech that sounded a lot like Michelle Obama’s

The passage in question from Melania’s speech centered on the importance of hard work and ambition. These are the two paragraphs, in particular, that have come under scrutiny.

This video shows how much the two speeches overlap:

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters