Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

McCain blasts Trump’s attack on Khans: he has no “license to defame” the “best among us”

John McCain
John McCain
Wakil Kohsar/AFP/Getty Images
Andrew Prokop
Andrew Prokop is a senior politics correspondent at Vox, covering the White House, elections, and political scandals and investigations. He’s worked at Vox since the site’s launch in 2014, and before that, he worked as a research assistant at the New Yorker’s Washington, DC, bureau.

The controversy over Donald Trump’s attacks on Captain Humayun Khan’s parents continues to roil the presidential race, and Sen. John McCain has now released a statement condemning the GOP nominee’s recent behavior.

“I challenge the nominee to set the example for what our country can and should represent,” McCain writes, in sentences that are bolded and underlined. “It is time for Donald Trump to set the example for our country and the future of the Republican Party. While our Party has bestowed upon him the nomination, it is not accompanied by unfettered license to defame those who are the best among us.”

Now, there are several cynical ways to interpret this statement. First of all, McCain still appears to support Trump for president. Additionally, he may be seeking to distance himself from the nominee for his own competitive Senate race, and he may partly be motivated by a personal grudge due to Trump questioning his own war heroism last year.

But in my view, this actually is quite a strong statement. McCain’s language (“defame”) is far stronger than that of Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell, who praised the Khan family and said they opposed Trump’s proposed Muslim immigration ban, but didn’t criticize Trump by name.

More importantly, McCain’s statement is deliberately written as a “challenge” to Trump — which means it is asking for a response. And McCain knows from experience that when he speaks his mind about Trump, he’ll likely provoke a response. (Trump’s attack on McCain’s war heroism, after all, was actually a direct response to McCain telling the New Yorker’s Ryan Lizza that Trump’s supporters were “crazies.”)

The question is now whether Trump will continue to dig in, and, if so, whether McCain will follow up his strong words with action.


More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters