Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Study: police officers have lower standards for searching black people than white people

When a police officer pulls over a driver, there are many reasons why he might try to initiate a search — maybe the driver is acting suspicious; maybe there are signs of drugs or an illegal gun.

Or maybe the driver is just black or Hispanic.

That’s the troubling conclusion of a new paper by Camelia Simoiu, Sam Corbett-Davies, and Sharad Goel at Stanford University, which evaluated the threshold that police use to search white, black, Hispanic, and Asian people in North Carolina. They found that the threshold used for black and Hispanic people was much lower than the threshold for their white and Asian counterparts.

To do this, the researchers put together a data set of 4.5 million traffic stops in North Carolina. They then ran this data set through a mathematical model developed for the study, which analyzes police officers’ average threshold for a search by looking at the race of a driver, the department of the officer making the stop, whether the stop resulted in a search, and whether a search turned up drugs, guns, or other contraband.

They found:

In nearly every one of the 100 [police] departments we consider, we find that black and Hispanic drivers are subject to a lower search threshold than whites, suggestive of discrimination against these groups. In many departments, we find the disparity is quite large, with the threshold for searching minorities 10 or even 20 percentage points lower than for searching whites. For Asians, in contrast, the inferred search thresholds are generally in line with those of whites, indicating an absence of discrimination against Asians in search decisions.

According to the study, if white and black drivers were held to the same standard, there would have been more than 30,000 fewer searches of black drivers (or one-third of searches of black drivers) and 8,000 fewer searches of Hispanic drivers (or more than half of searches of Hispanic drivers) over the six years in the data set.

The findings stood when the model checked for variations in the year, time of day, age, and gender. Across all these variables, Hispanic and black drivers were held to a lower standard before cops initiated a search.

There are several important caveats to the paper. For one, it’s the first time this new mathematical model has been used — and it will need much more study to know just how reliable it is. The results are also only for one state, so it’s not clear if they apply nationwide.

The researchers also caution that they can’t definitively conclude that the differences between races are entirely motivated by racial bias: “For example, officers might instead be applying lower search thresholds to those from lower socioeconomic backgrounds, a demographic that is disproportionately black and Hispanic. At the very least, though, our results indicate that there are concerning irregularities in the search decisions we study.”

But there’s reason to believe these findings are onto something. Multiple studies and investigations have found, for example, that police are more likely to search black and Hispanic people than their white peers, even though searches of black and Hispanic drivers are less likely to turn up contraband. That suggests that cops are searching too many minority drivers, picking up a lot of innocent people along the way.

The study puts a different spin on this type of data, potentially showing yet another way minority Americans are overpoliced.


Watch: Why recording the police is so important

See More:

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters