Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Trump: this Esquire article proves I opposed the Iraq War. Esquire: no, it doesn’t.

The only piece of evidence that Trump cited in support of his claim just went down the drain.

Donald Trump campaigns in Philadelphia.
Donald Trump campaigns in Philadelphia.
Mark Makela/Getty Images

Donald Trump insists he opposed the Iraq War before it began. His main piece of evidence? “You can look at Esquire magazine from ’04,” Trump said during the NBC News candidate forum on Wednesday night.

Well, if you do look at the Esquire piece Trump was referencing — which he wrote for the magazine — it now comes with a very big disclaimer:

Editor’s note: The following story was published in the August 2004 issue of Esquire. During the 2016 presidential election, Donald Trump has repeatedly claimed to have been against the Iraq War from the beginning, and he has cited this story as proof. The Iraq War began in March 2003, more than a year before this story ran, thus nullifying Trump’s timeline. More details can be found here.

The problem for Trump’s claim, then, is the basic concept of time. He says he always opposed the Iraq War — even before it officially began. But his only piece of evidence is an article published more than a year after the war started.

But there’s a reason Trump only points to this article. When you do look at Trump’s comments before the Iraq War, they actually show he supported the invasion. Here’s what Trump said in 2002 in an exchange with Howard Stern:

STERN: Are you for invading Iraq?

TRUMP: Yeah, I guess so. I wish the first time it was done correctly.

Not only did Trump say he was for invading Iraq, but he seemed to suggest that the US should have invaded even earlier — back in the early 1990s, during the Gulf War. That’s as opposite as you can get from Trump’s claim.


Watch: This election isn’t just Democrat vs. Republican. It’s normal vs abnormal.

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters