Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

2016 is the year of “post-truth,” according to the Oxford Dictionaries

In 2015, the word of the year was a laughing emoji.

Caroline Framke
Caroline Framke wrote about culture, which usually means television. Also seen @ The A.V. Club, The Atlantic, Complex, Flavorwire, NPR, the fridge to get more seltzer.

If the Oxford Dictionaries’ word of the year is meant to encapsulate an entire year in language and culture, 2016’s is particularly — and, let’s be real, fittingly — bleak.

In a press release, the dictionary announced that the most representative word for this year is “post-truth,” which the dictionary defines as follows:

post-truth: Relating to or denoting circumstances in which objective facts are less influential in shaping public opinion than appeals to emotion and personal belief.

Yeah, sounds about right.

It’s true that the concept of “post-truth” has been around for far longer than just this year. The Oxford Dictionaries’ press release credits the term to Serbian-American playwright Steve Tesich, who used it despairingly in a 1992 essay in the Nation. Merriam-Webster even crowned a version of the term as its own word of the year in 2006, which went to Stephen Colbert’s “truthiness” (or “the quality of preferring concepts or facts one wishes to be true, rather than concepts or facts known to be true”).

But president of Oxford Dictionaries Casper Grathwohl — a name so perfect for the president of Oxford Dictionaries that I’d understand if you thought I made it up — credited the year’s whiplash-inducing political climate for helping “post-truth” beat out finalists like “alt-right” and “woke.”

Oxford English Dictionary

Grathwohl said that “post-truth” is the most relevant it’s ever been in 2016, “fueled by the rise of social media as a news source and a growing distrust of facts offered up by the establishment.”

Grathwohl’s statement even explicitly referenced the victories of Brexit and Donald Trump — who just won the election after a steady campaign of half-truths and flat-out lies — as factors in the dictionary’s decision.

Needless to say, the idea that “post-truth” could not just exemplify this year but — in Grathwohl’s words — be “one of the defining words of our time” is a frightening one.

And if you needed further proof that 2016 has been a particularly intense harbinger of chaos, look no further than the Oxford Dictionaries’ word of the year for 2015, which was the “face laughing with tears” emoji.

LOL.

More in Culture

Life
What is an aging face supposed to look like?What is an aging face supposed to look like?
Life

When bodies and appearances are malleable, what does that mean for the person underneath?

By Allie Volpe
Video
What would J.R.R. Tolkien think of Palantir?What would J.R.R. Tolkien think of Palantir?
Play
Video

How The Lord of the Rings lore helps explain the mysterious tech company.

By Benjamin Stephen
Climate
The climate crisis is coming for your groceriesThe climate crisis is coming for your groceries
Climate

Extreme heat is already wiping out soy, coffee, berries, and Christmas trees. Farm animals and humans are suffering too.

By Ayurella Horn-Muller
Future Perfect
The surprisingly strong case for feeling great about your coffee habitThe surprisingly strong case for feeling great about your coffee habit
Future Perfect

Your morning coffee is one of modern life’s underrated miracles.

By Bryan Walsh
Good Medicine
Do health influencers actually know what they’re talking about?Do health influencers actually know what they’re talking about?
Good Medicine

Most health influencers don’t have real credentials — but they are more influential than ever.

By Dylan Scott
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North