Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Hillary Clinton: Blaming all of Islam for terrorist attacks is a huge strategic mistake

At Saturday night’s Democratic debate, Hillary Clinton argued that it’s not just wrong to broadly blame all of Islam for the acts of radical terrorists, but also potentially dangerous to America’s national security interests.

Clinton said:

I think that you can talk about Islamists who clearly are also jihadists. But I think it’s not particularly helpful.

To make the case that Sen. Sanders was just making that I agree with, we’ve got to reach out to Muslim countries, we’ve got to have them be part of our coalition. If they hear people running for president who basically shortcut it to say we are somehow against Islam, that was one of the real contributions — despite all the other problems that George W. Bush made after 9/11 — when he basically said after going to a mosque in Washington, we are not at war with Islam or Muslims. We are at war with violent extremism. We are at war with people who use their religion for purposes of power and oppression. And yes, we are at war with those people. But I don’t want us to be painting with too broad a brush.

Since Muslim nations are crucial to fighting terrorist organizations in the Middle East — Jordan, for one, has participated in airstrikes against ISIS — potentially ostracizing these allies by decrying all of Islam can actually make taking on terrorism more difficult.

This isn’t a solely Democratic idea. Like Clinton said, former President George W. Bush also cautioned against blaming all Muslims for terrorist attacks following 9/11. “The face of terror is not the true faith of Islam,” Bush said in his September 17, 2001, address. “That’s not what Islam is all about. Islam is peace.”

As my colleague Zack Beauchamp explained, this was a strategic decision for Bush:

This was partly strategic, a way to undercut jihadists’ narrative of representing “true” Islam in a religious war against the US. But Bush, who emphasized Muslim contributions to human civilization and to the US, also seemed earnestly concerned about combating any backlash against Muslims in the US.

Under this view, blaming all Muslims for terrorist attacks isn’t just wrong, it also makes it more difficult to win the war on terror.


Watch: Syria’s civil war, explained

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters