Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

CBO: GOP repeal bill would cause “thousands” of unintended pregnancies

The Congressional Budget Office’s forecast that 24 million would lose coverage under the GOP health plan got a lot of attention on Monday.

But on Tuesday, Janet Adamy at the Wall Street Journal flagged another important projection that went under the radar. CBO estimated that the GOP plan would cause “thousands” more unintended pregnancies by defunding Planned Parenthood.

The Republican health care plan, as my colleague Emily Crockett explains, would bar Planned Parenthood clinics from participating in the Medicaid program. CBO expects that change would make it more difficult for women who are low-income or in rural areas to access care. Here’s what the report actually says:

The people most likely to experience reduced access to care would probably reside in areas without other health care clinics or medical practitioners who serve low-income populations. CBO projects that about 15 percent of those people would lose access to care.

This isn’t the first time CBO has weighed in on defunding Planned Parenthood. In late 2015, the agency estimated that 630,000 women would lose access to care should Congress cut off funding to the clinics. Planned Parenthood estimates it serves 2.6 million patients annually.

Planned Parenthood is undeniably a huge provider of birth control, preventive screenings, and other services for low-income women. Researchers at the Guttmacher Institute estimate that in 103 of the 491 counties that Planned Parenthood serves, it is the only safety-net family planning clinic.

It’s places like this where CBO expects Planned Parenthood’s loss of federal funds to have the most severe impact — and to leave patients little options to seek similar care elsewhere.

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters