Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

3 Freedom Caucus Republicans voted against the Republican health bill in committee

Republicans Vote For New Speaker Of The House
Republicans Vote For New Speaker Of The House
Rep. Dave Brat (R-VA) voted against moving the bill to the House floor
Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

The American Health Care Act cleared another hurdle on Thursday, and now it’s headed to the Rules Committee before getting a vote on the House floor.

Republicans on the House Budget Committee voted quickly, but not unanimously, on Thursday morning to pass the Republican plan to replace Obamacare. About 30 minutes into a hearing on the bill, the committee voted 19-17 to advance the bill to the Rules Committee and set the stage for a full House vote.

Republicans didn’t represent the same unified front as they had done in the earlier Ways and Means and Energy Committee markups last week. This time, three GOP members of the committee — all part of the conservative House Freedom Caucus — voted against moving the bill.

Rep. Dave Brat (R-VA), Rep. Mark Sanford (R-SC), and Rep. Gary Palmer (R-AL), all joined Democrats in offering a “no” vote to the bill, bringing the vote total just short of a tie.

It was an odd coalition for the first roll call vote of the hearing, as Brat, Sanford, and Palmer have criticized the bill for not being conservative enough, while Democrats continue to decry the cuts to Medicaid and safety nets for low-income citizens.

Still, the conservative opposition has long been expected. Brat said he would not vote for the plan in committee prior to the hearing, and the Freedom Caucus has been vocal in its opposition to the bill.

More Republicans on the panel have voiced some concerns about the bill, and acknowledged that it is not comprehensive under the restrictions of the budget reconciliation process that Republicans are attempting to use in the Senate to avoid a Democratic filibuster.

“No one is saying it’s a perfect plan,” Rep. Rob Woodall (R-GA) said. “It’s not even a complete plan.” Even so, enough of those concerns were apparently assuaged for the vote.

The rest of the Budget Committee hearing won’t be another marathon session, akin to the all-night affairs in Energy and Commerce and Ways and Means. Under the rules of the hearing, each party can offer up to seven motions, which, if passed, will be recommended to the Rules Committee, but won’t become permanent changes to the bill.

See More:

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters