Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Rep. Jason Chaffetz on AHCA: Americans might have to choose between iPhones and health insurance

Following the reveal of a highly anticipated Republican Obamacare replacement plan, Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) offered a line of reasoning that Republicans chided President Barack Obama for in 2014.

Tuesday morning, on CNN’s New Day, Chaffetz said that when it comes to health care, Americans will have to make a choice between a shiny new iPhone and insurance. It was an early indication that he knows the replacement plan — the American Health Care Act — doesn’t fix all the shortfalls of Obamacare, including cost.

“Americans have choices, and they’ve gotta make a choice,” Chaffetz said. “And so maybe rather than getting that new iPhone that they just love and they want to go spend hundreds of dollars on that, maybe they should invest in their own health care. They’ve gotta make those decisions themselves.”

This is a similar argument to the one Obama made in 2014, in response to a Hispanic constituent’s concerns over Obamacare’s price: “If you looked at their cable bill, their telephone, their cell phone bill, it may turn out that it’s just they haven’t prioritized health care.”

At the time, Obama’s remark received backlash from conservative media for its deal-with-it tone, as in this Daily Caller article, resurfaced by Politico’s Jason Millman:

A trade-off between luxury and insurance, however, is not one President Donald Trump has accounted for in his promises to the American people. He has claimed the Obamacare replacement plan would be more affordable and insure everybody.

But as Vox’s Sarah Kliff explained, Republicans are still not completely sure how much their replacement plan is going to cost, or how many people will be covered. They have decided to move forward without a score from the Congressional Budget Office, which puts an estimate on both those factors. It’s likely the AHCA will insure fewer people and be more expensive for the poor and the sick, Kliff reports.

Chaffetz has acknowledged the possibility.

“More access, but possibly less coverage? That might be the byproduct?” CNN’s Alisyn Camerota asked him.

“Well, yes. I think that’s fair,” Chaffetz said. “But we’re just now consuming this. So more of the analysis has to happen.”

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters