Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Trump camp defends Melania’s speech: Michelle Obama didn’t “invent” the English language

The Trump campaign has launched a new defense of Melania Trump’s apparent plagiarism of a Michelle Obama speech: that the first lady didn’t invent the English language.

There are two paragraphs from Melania Trump’s Republican National Convention remarks that look incredibly similar to Michelle Obama’s 2008 speech at the Democratic convention.

But in true Trump style, the campaign isn’t apologizing for the speechwriting error but is instead defending it. In a brief Facebook Live interview with the Hill, Trump spokesperson Katrina Pierson made the case that this was just two people speaking the same language.

“And this concept that Michelle Obama invented the English language is absurd,” Pierson said. “Look at the remarks from Laura Bush in 2004, and I think you will find something similar.”

She also added, “These are values – Republican values, by the way – of hard work, determination, family values, dedication, and respect, and that’s Melania Trump.”

I did look at Laura Bush’s speech from the 2004 Republican convention — and sure enough, like many first ladies before her, Bush talked about family and the importance of hard work. She shared an anecdote about a small-business owner, Carmella, who once told her, “If you’re determined and you want to work hard, you can do anything you want to. That’s the beautiful thing about America.” Bush also spoke of her husband’s unwavering values. She did not, however, use the same sentence structure, paragraph structure, and language as Michelle and Melania.


Watch: Did Melania Trump plagiarize Michelle Obama?

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters