Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Correlate This! Facebook Pokes Princeton in Data Science Payback.

Hell hath no fury like a scientist scorned.

Facebook/Mike Develin

Never provoke a data scientist with time on his hands.

A study from a pair of Princeton University researchers made the rounds this week because of a particularly bold claim — that Facebook would lose 80 percent of its user base in the next three years.

The paper compared Facebook’s rise to that of a disease, and as such suggested that the social network would follow similar patterns of dying out as existing disease models.

Not one to take a scientific potshot lying down, Facebook’s Data Science team posted its own “study” on Thursday evening, making the tongue-in-cheek claim that Princeton, too, was in trouble.

“Using the same robust methodology featured in the paper, we attempted to find out more about this ‘Princeton University’ — and you won’t believe what we found!” Facebook data scientist Mike Develin wrote.

“In keeping with the scientific principle ‘correlation equals causation,’ our research unequivocally demonstrated that Princeton may be in danger of disappearing entirely.”

Develin then proceeded to point to a decline of published Princeton research papers over the span of the past decade, a flippant jab at the two scholars’ apparent methods.

It’s pretty funny and, as Develin makes sure to note at the bottom of his post, all in good fun — though a multibillion dollar company debunking a paper from two relative unknowns seems like a pretty sharp poke back.

The harshest part of Facebook’s spurious science? While Princeton is on the decline, Harvard and Yale are doing better than ever.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh