Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

A Grand Theory of Snapchat, as Constructed by Snapchat

Every so often there are glimpses of method behind the Snapchat madness.

In the tech industry, conversations about ephemeral messaging service Snapchat often focus on a few things.

  1. Snapchat turned down a $3 billion dollar offer from Facebook.
  2. The service was hacked. Badly.
  3. CEO Evan Spiegel’s frat boy persona has rubbed some people the wrong way.
  4. It’s all about teen sexting.

But the reality is, Snapchat is a wildly popular app, with more than 400 million messages received every day. Clearly, it has significant appeal.

Every so often there are glimpses of method behind the Snapchat madness. At our Dive Into Mobile conference last year, for example, Spiegel explained that when people live their lives online, the concept of sharing changes. That is: photos shared in the moment and given a short lifespan are a more authentic form of self-expression than those curated and selectively archived on social media.

Here’s another glimpse: Spiegel recently published notes for a speech he gave yesterday, in which he describes the emergence of Snapchat.

Spiegel’s big point: Snapchat is a viable means of communication.

He’s said that before, but he also adds a few interesting observations worth noting on their own:

The selfie makes sense as the fundamental unit of communication on Snapchat because it marks the transition between digital media as self-expression and digital media as communication.

Spiegel explains this as communicating through media, rather than around media, as people would in a caption or comment thread.

Snapchat sets expectations around conversation that mirror the expectations we have when we’re talking in-person.

But if Snapchat is a form of communication, it often isn’t very deep or informative. It’s more about here’s where I am, here’s how I feel, or hey, I’m bored. Spiegel has an explanation for that too.

Snapchat focuses on the experience of conversation — not the transfer of information.

The full speech itself is a bit loopy, but here’s the text as posted by Spiegel:

2014 AXS Partner Summit Keynote by evan3268

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh