Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Gmail-Google+ Link Makes You Easier to Reach -- For Better or Worse

It’s like Google Buzz 2.0.

Google

There’s convenient, and then there’s just plain invasive.

Gmail and Google+ are hooking up like never before. Soon, any Google+ user will be able to send emails to other Google+ users over Gmail, even if they don’t know each others’ Gmail addresses.

So, simply put, say you’re trying to send an email to me, but don’t know my Gmail address. If you’re connected to me on Google+, you’ll be able to send that message to me regardless.

It’s slightly complicated, and there are a bunch of caveats (as there always are with Google settings). You can’t spam people with more than one email, and all messages sent via this method will be relegated to the “social” Gmail tab.

But essentially, this is a massive easing of the friction involved in sending messages to other Google users. And it’s opt-out — meaning you’ll have to explicitly choose not to allow this when Google rolls the feature out slowly over the next few days.

In a sense, it’s baffling that Google would make the choice to do something like this — especially after the massive disaster that was Google Buzz (which this new feature looks to have at least some similarities with). I’ve had three ex-Google employees email me incredulous messages in the past hour, wondering why Google is incorporating the new feature.

Even former Google+ team member Kevin Rose thinks as much:

To be fair to Google here, I can see how it’s at least somewhat convenient, in that you’ll be able to send messages to people you just haven’t been in touch with before. I guess if you’re an avid Google+ user, that may be helpful.

But for most everyone else, this seems like an added feature that will cause more headaches and privacy upsets than anything else.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh