Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Good News, TV Guys: ComScore Found Your Missing TV Watchers

They’re still watching TV -- just not on TVs. But about those cord-cutting numbers ...

Peter Kafka
Peter Kafka covered media and technology, and their intersection, at Vox. Many of his stories can be found in his Kafka on Media newsletter, and he also hosts the Recode Media podcast.

If you’re a TV programmer, you’re very worried about the recent erosion in TV ratings, which have hit networks across the board this year. The best-case scenario: People are still watching your shows, but they’re watching them in ways that aren’t properly measured, like on the Web.

That’s what Nielsen says is happening, and now comScore has a bit of data to help shore up that argument: A new survey that says the younger TV watchers are, the less likely they are to watch TV shows on actual TVs.

That may not be shocking, but it is still interesting to see the results of comScore’s self-reported poll of online users, conducted in August. For instance, millennials say they spend a third of their TV-watching time watching TV on computers, tablets and phones:

Comscore TV watching

And you can see similar trends in response to a related question, about the different devices TV users have used recently. Nearly a third of millennials say they’ve watched a TV show on their phones in the last month:

These results are flattering to the TV guys, because it means their missing eyeballs aren’t lost, just misplaced. But even if the results are accurate, it’s hard to imagine that people who watch TV on Web-connected devices like phones and laptops aren’t also watching lots of other, non-TV video.

Meanwhile, not all of comScore’s data is that reassuring. The company says a whopping 24 percent of 18-to-34-year-olds say they’re not subscribing to pay TV. More than half of those folks — 13 percent of the total number polled — say they’ve cut the cord, while 11 percent say they’ve never had a cord, period.

If you’re a TV guy who wants to make yourself feel better about those numbers, tell yourself that it’s a self-reported online survey, so those results could be overstated. Then again, you have to tell yourself the same thing about the data that made you feel good, too.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh