Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Netflix Misses Its Q3 Subscriber Numbers, and Its Stock Tanks

Uh oh. “This quarter we over-forecasted membership growth.”

Asa Mathat
Peter Kafka
Peter Kafka covered media and technology, and their intersection, at Vox. Many of his stories can be found in his Kafka on Media newsletter, and he also hosts the Recode Media podcast.

A first look at Netflix’s Q3 numbers: Revenue of $1.41 billion and earnings of 96 cents, more or less in line with expectations. But just as important are its subscriber numbers, and those are below the company’s forecast and analysts’ expectations. “This quarter we over-forecasted membership growth,” wrote CEO Reed Hastings in a letter to investors.

Not surprisingly, the company’s stock is heading south: Right now, shares are down 25 percent. In English: That’s a drop of more than $113 dollars.

The company missed on both its U.S. and international numbers: It ended the quarter with 37.2 million domestic subscribers, and it had predicted 37.6 million; it also had 15.84 million subscribers outside the U.S., and it had told Wall Street to expect 16.16 million.

Hastings tells investors that some of the miss is due to a price hike the company introduced earlier in the year, and that he doesn’t think it’s from competition from the likes of Amazon, Hulu and cable TV networks like HBO.

Speaking of HBO and its plan to sell a Netflix-like service of its own, Hastings says he’s not surprised: “Starting back in 2011, we started saying that HBO would be our primary long-term competitor, particularly for content. The competition will drive us both to be better. It was inevitable and sensible that they would eventually offer their service as a standalone application. Many people will subscribe to both Netflix and HBO since we have different shows, so we think it is likely we will both prosper as consumers move to Internet TV.”

Netflix has always been a volatile stock, with plenty of investors who buy it because they like the service and the story, and plenty of shorts as well. But even by Netflix’s standards, that’s a staggering loss.

Here’s one way to put a positive spin on it: A year ago, when Netflix’s stock was bumping up against $400, Hastings told investors that it seemed too high to him, and was likely spurred by “momentum-investor-fueled euphoria.”

In the next 12 months the market ignored him and pushed the company’s shares as high as $489. They seem to have finally come around: It’s now back down to $329.

Here’s RBC analyst Mark Mahaney’s helpful cheat sheet so you can interpret the company’s numbers on your own.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh