Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

TV has more gay characters now, but most of them are white

A still from HBO’s Looking
A still from HBO’s Looking
A still from HBO’s Looking
HBO
Alex Abad-Santos
Alex Abad-Santos is a senior correspondent who explains what society obsesses over, from Marvel and movies to fitness and skin care. He came to Vox in 2014. Prior to that, he worked at The Atlantic.

In the 2014-2015 television season, gay characters will make up 3.9 percent of primetime series broadcast regulars, GLAAD reports. This is a good thing. It's an increase from the year before, and it's closer to the record high of 2012, when LGBT characters represented 4.4. percent of all primetime series broadcast regulars.

The breakdown and statistics of each network’s LGBT representation can be found in GLAAD’s extensive “Where We Are On TV” report. Begun in 2005, the report is a status update on how our television shows reflect real life.

While television is arguably America’s most accessible form of art, it hasn’t always been the most inclusive. And there are a lot of Americans who grew up not seeing any representation of themselves on television. And there are a lot of shows on television about the U.S. that absolutely don’t reflect the people who live here.

When it comes to depictions of LGBT people, television isn’t anywhere close to the mythic 10 percent figure established by Kinsey, though it is closer to a study from UCLA professor Gary Gates, who estimates the LGBT population to be closer to 4 percent of all Americans. But where there seems to be the greatest drop-off, is when it comes to the lack of non-white LGBT characters on network television:

GLAAD

(GLAAD)

GLAAD found that 26 percent of announced LGBT characters on primetime broadcast television were non-white. If that reflected real life, the number, as Gates told me in July, would probably be closer to 50 percent non-white.

The diversity gap is closer on cable television:

Screen_Shot_2014-10-01_at_4.46.41_PM.0.png

(GLAAD)

That isn’t to say that white characters’ stories aren’t as important as non-white ones. And further, GLAAD’s report isn’t really a barometer of which characters are fully-fleshed out, versus which ones are caricatures. It’s just that there are stories, despite these improvements, that still aren’t being told, and the texture of race and ethnicity that is alive in the LGBT experience isn’t translating on screen (yet).

For the full report, head on over to GLAAD.

More in Culture

Life
What is an aging face supposed to look like?What is an aging face supposed to look like?
Life

When bodies and appearances are malleable, what does that mean for the person underneath?

By Allie Volpe
Video
What would J.R.R. Tolkien think of Palantir?What would J.R.R. Tolkien think of Palantir?
Play
Video

How The Lord of the Rings lore helps explain the mysterious tech company.

By Benjamin Stephen
Climate
The climate crisis is coming for your groceriesThe climate crisis is coming for your groceries
Climate

Extreme heat is already wiping out soy, coffee, berries, and Christmas trees. Farm animals and humans are suffering too.

By Ayurella Horn-Muller
Future Perfect
The surprisingly strong case for feeling great about your coffee habitThe surprisingly strong case for feeling great about your coffee habit
Future Perfect

Your morning coffee is one of modern life’s underrated miracles.

By Bryan Walsh
Good Medicine
Do health influencers actually know what they’re talking about?Do health influencers actually know what they’re talking about?
Good Medicine

Most health influencers don’t have real credentials — but they are more influential than ever.

By Dylan Scott
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North