Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Polls show the GOP has a 72% chance of Senate takeover. But how accurate are Senate polls?

Andrew Prokop
Andrew Prokop is a senior politics correspondent at Vox, covering the White House, elections, and political scandals and investigations. He’s worked at Vox since the site’s launch in 2014, and before that, he worked as a research assistant at the New Yorker’s Washington, DC, bureau.
Senate forecasts 10-20-14

As we wrote last week, election forecasts have been looking better and better for Republicans lately. This is mainly because GOP candidates have taken consistent leads in the purple states of Iowa and Colorado, while Democratic incumbents in Alaska, Arkansas, and Louisiana have fallen even further behind.

With the election 15 days away and the GOP’s advantage looking clear, forecasters have recently been tackling an interesting question — how often has Senate polling in previous years been wrong?

  • Nate Silver examined polls of Senate races from 1990 to 2012 in the final 21 days of the campaign. He found that consistent bias of the polls of a few percentage points in one partisan direction or another was common. But, he argued, there's little consistency year to year that would help indicate which direction this year's bias might be in.
  • Meanwhile, Sam Wang pointed out that, in 2010 and 2012, Senate Democrats outperformed the polls in close races by a couple percentage points.
  • Back in July, Josh Katz of the Upshot analyzed all Senate polling from 2004 to 2012. He found that candidates leading by less than four points in polls two weeks before the election only ended up winning 67 percent of the time. In the final week of the campaign, accuracy rises to 81 percent. (Right now, FiveThirtyEight estimates that there are six Senate races where the leader is ahead by four points or less.)
  • And political scientist John Sides wrote that late movement in Senate races polling tends to be in the direction the funbd

Overall, while Senate race polling has been accurate overall, there remains room for some surprises. But whether those surprises will benefit Democrats who’ve fallen behind, or Republicans in races they currently trail in, remains to be seen.

Battle for Congress

More in Congress

America, Actually
The progressive plan to reclaim the working classThe progressive plan to reclaim the working class
Podcast
America, Actually

Progressive caucus chair Rep. Greg Casar on his movement’s new playbook.

By Astead Herndon
Podcasts
The 1980s sex scandal that explains TMZ’s move to DCThe 1980s sex scandal that explains TMZ’s move to DC
Podcast
Podcasts

How a senator’s downfall paved the way for Donald Trump.

By Kelli Wessinger and Noel King
Politics
The redistricting wars are almost over. Here’s the score.The redistricting wars are almost over. Here’s the score.
Politics

Trump’s gerrymandering efforts are backfiring.

By Christian Paz
America, Actually
Rubén Gallego on why he defended Eric Swalwell — and why he regrets it nowRubén Gallego on why he defended Eric Swalwell — and why he regrets it now
America, Actually

An interview with the senator Swalwell called his “best friend.”

By Astead Herndon
Today, Explained newsletter
Eric Swalwell’s downfall, explainedEric Swalwell’s downfall, explained
Today, Explained newsletter

The accusations that forced out the frontrunner in California’s governor race — and could push him from Congress next.

By Benjy Sarlin
Podcasts
How one Democratic senator is tackling Trump’s corruptionHow one Democratic senator is tackling Trump’s corruption
Podcast
Podcasts

Sen. Chris Murphy explains how blatant corruption is undermining faith in democracy.

By Astead Herndon