Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

GT Advanced: Confidentiality Pact Bars It From Explaining Bankruptcy Filing

The iPhone maker has been known in general to place strict confidentiality requirements on its many suppliers.

Apple

Apple Inc supplier GT Advanced Technologies Inc told a U.S. court it was barred from disclosing why it filed for bankruptcy, saying the company was “tied up in knots” by a confidentiality agreement.

A lawyer for the company told the court on Thursday it could not reveal its bankruptcy game-plan as a result.

GT Advanced has a deal with Apple that involves outfitting an Arizona factory to make scratch-resistant sapphire glass exclusively for the iPhone maker. The iPhone maker, which zealously guards the secrecy of its product pipeline, has been known in general to place strict confidentiality requirements on its many suppliers.

Apple said on Wednesday that it was surprised with the bankruptcy filing and that it was working with Arizona officials on its next moves.

GT Advanced has offered little explanation for its surprise bankruptcy filing, which led to its stock falling more than 90 percent on Monday, wiping out nearly all of its $1.5 billion market worth.

Earlier on Thursday, GT Advanced had asked the bankruptcy court to keep under seal some key documents relating to a third party, saying this would allow it to avoid paying damages under confidentiality agreements.

It did not disclose the identity of the third party nor the nature of the potential contract violations.

In a filing with a U.S. bankruptcy court in New Hampshire early on Thursday, the company also asked that the hearing to deal with this request be held “in camera,” or closed to the public.

“GTAT recognizes the unusual (and perhaps unprecedented) nature of the request made in this Motion,” the company said in the filing.

GT Advanced said it was compelled to make the request to avoid the risk of paying damages of $50 million per violation.

The case is In re: GT Advanced Technologies Inc, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of New Hampshire, No: 14-11916.

(Reporting by Tanya Agrawal and Tom Hals; Editing by Ted Kerr, Robin Paxton and W Simon)

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Future Perfect
The 5 most unhinged revelations from Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAIThe 5 most unhinged revelations from Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAI
Future Perfect

The Musk v. OpenAI trial is over. Here are the receipts.

By Sara Herschander
Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady