Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Obama wants to regulate the internet like a utility. His FCC chair disagrees.

Mark Wilson/Getty Images
  • FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler is not on board with President Obama’s call for the commission to reclassify internet service providers as telecommunications services, Brian Fung and Nancy Scola report.
  • Instead, Wheeler told industry figures in a Monday meeting that he wants to figure out a way to “split the baby” and deliver some form of network neutrality in another way.
  • Wheeler’s predecessor at the FCC, Julius Genachowski, sought net neutrality without reclassification but was rebuffed by the courts.
  • Obama appoints the Chairman of the FCC and a majority of its members, but it’s an independent agency and he can’t tell commissioners what to do.
  • It is not entirely clear what Wheeler’s favored approach is, but in late October he floated a “hybrid” approach to the issue that would not go as far as Obama has called for.

The background

All year, net neutrality activists have been urging Obama to take a strong stance in favor of reclassification, which would subject internet providers to strict utility-style regulation. On Monday, the president changed that with a dramatic statement. The statement, combined with the Democratic majority on the FCC and the Republican majority in Congress served to drastically raise expectations. Maybe this was a forum in which Obama could get his way unencumbered by Congress.

Wheeler’s statement on Monday casts some doubt on those expectations. Doubt that reenforces old criticisms of Wheeler’s background as a lobbyist for cable and mobile phone companies.

Further Reading

See Vox’s complete guide to the net neutrality debate. But also note Timothy Lee’s argument that in some ways the net neutrality debate is becoming obsolete, as related — but legally distinct — issues are rising in the realm of “peering” and other areas. Susan Crawford believes the best solution to these problems is for the government to directly provide internet access. Giving a hint of the murky waters around Wheeler’s search for a third way, America’s biggest cable company reiterated today that they say they support the principle of net neutrality but object to reclassification.

See More:

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh