Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Fan TV, Which Wanted to Replace Your Cable Box and Your Apple TV, Heads for the Exits

The company, which had an ambitious plan to meld the Web and pay TV, has been looking for a buyer for months.

Fan TV
Peter Kafka
Peter Kafka covered media and technology, and their intersection, at Vox. Many of his stories can be found in his Kafka on Media newsletter, and he also hosts the Recode Media podcast.

Fan TV, a startup that wanted to make it easier to watch Web video — and conventional TV — on TV sets, looks like it is ready to throw in the towel.

Industry sources say the set-top-box maker has spent much of this year looking for a buyer, and a person familiar with Fan says a deal is likely to be announced this week.

Conventional wisdom among industry sources is that Fan’s investors, who put at least $40 million into different incarnations of the company over the years, will be unlikely to get all of their money back. Some sources say the company was recently looking for something in the $15 million range.

Assuming that a deal goes through with numbers like that, the logical conclusion will be that Fan failed at a tough task: Selling a stylish, affordable box that integrated Web video and pay-TV programming, without a big push from pay-TV providers or deep-pocketed consumer tech companies. I’ve asked Fan CEO Gilles BianRosa and some of his investors for comment.

Fan has a slightly confusing corporate history; it started life as a spinout from Vuze, a BitTorrent software company. For a few years, it concentrated on video “discovery” software that was supposed to help Web video watchers find their favorite shows and movies across competing platforms, like Netflix and Apple’s iTunes.

This year, operating as Fan TV, it started selling a $149 box that was supposed to replace both conventional pay TV set-top boxes and Web video boxes like Apple TV and Roku.

The idea: Using the Fan TV box and remote, co-created by design star Yves Behar, a video watcher could easily flip between Web video and stuff that came from a pay-TV provider. Right now, most boxes either provide programming from cable TV or the Web, but don’t combine them.

“This is what we have always hoped Apple TV would be,” BTIG analyst Rich Greenfield raved this summer. You can see a demo he created of the box in action at the bottom of this post.

Unlike some Web-TV boxes, Fan TV was designed to work in conjunction with pay-TV providers, not to replace them. At least in its current incarnation, the device wouldn’t work unless customers already had pay-TV subscriptions.

Fan TV launched this spring with the approval of Time Warner Cable. But the pay-TV provider, which has also worked with Web TV box maker Roku and has reportedly entertained a deal with Apple to integrate an Apple TV box into its service, didn’t seem to push Fan very heavily. Worth nothing: Comcast*, which is trying to buy Time Warner Cable, has spent heavily.

Meanwhile, most recent efforts to create standalone video-discovery software and hardware haven’t panned out. Boxee, which initially made waves with its Web video set-top box, ended up selling for a modest sum to Samsung, which has also picked up Shelby TV, a video-guide software startup.

Last year, Apple “acqhired” Matcha.tv; earlier this year, video “check-in” service Viggle bought guide-maker Dijit.

So far, the most promising video software/hardware service that isn’t attached to a pay-TV company or the likes of Apple, Amazon or Google is Roku, which says it has sold 10 million of its TV boxes. The company is reportedly pursuing an IPO.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TyYBJTFVOo0

* Comcast owns NBCUniversal, which is a minority investor in Revere Digital, Re/code’s parent company.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh