Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

A judge tossed the conviction of a black 14-year-old boy who was executed 70 years ago

South Carolina Department of Archives and History/Handout
  1. A judge has vacated the murder conviction of George Stinney, Jr., a black South Carolina teen who was executed 70 years ago, Reuters reports.
  2. Stinney was convicted of beating two young white girls to death with a railroad spike in 1944, when he was 14.
  3. He's often cited as the youngest person executed in the U.S. in the 20th century. He was only 95 pounds at the time and had to sit on a phone book in the electric chair.

Long-delayed justice

Stinney confessed to the 1944 murder, and the all-white jury took only ten minutes to find him guilty. But civil rights activists have argued for years that his confession was coerced, and in 2009, his sister wrote an affidavit providing an alibi for him.

Based on these facts, his family petitioned for a new trial. Because there was no trial transcript and no surviving physical evidence, South Carolina Circuit Court judge Carmen Mullen ruled to simply overturn the conviction.

Further reading

How subconscious racism complicates racial disparities in policing

It’s not just Ferguson: America’s criminal justice system is racist

The terrifying racial stereotypes laced through Darren Wilson’s testimony

Telling white people the criminal justice system is racist makes them like it more

Policy
Is Trump’s Justice Department trying to discredit itself?Is Trump’s Justice Department trying to discredit itself?
Policy

The DOJ used to avoid spectacles like the Louise Lucas raid.

By Ian Millhiser
Politics
What the Supreme Court still has left to decide this termWhat the Supreme Court still has left to decide this term
Politics

Democracy and Donald Trump dominate the Court’s remaining docket.

By Ian Millhiser
Politics
The Supreme Court seems a bit nervous about letting the police track you with your phoneThe Supreme Court seems a bit nervous about letting the police track you with your phone
Politics

The justices were concerned that the Trump administration is asking for too much in a major police surveillance case.

By Ian Millhiser
Politics
The Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track youThe Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track you
Politics

Chatrie v. United States asks what limits the Constitution places on the surveillance state in an age of cellphones.

By Ian Millhiser
Policy
Pam Bondi’s ouster makes Trump’s Justice Department even more dangerousPam Bondi’s ouster makes Trump’s Justice Department even more dangerous
Policy

The best thing about Bondi was her incompetence.

By Ian Millhiser
Culture
Me Too revealed a lot of villains. Why is Epstein the one we still care about?Me Too revealed a lot of villains. Why is Epstein the one we still care about?
Culture

How the Epstein story became an American parable.

By Constance Grady