Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Rand Paul is hammering Marco Rubio over Cuba on Twitter. Welcome to the 2016 primary.

Rand Paul and Marco Rubio, in late 2010.
Rand Paul and Marco Rubio, in late 2010.
Rand Paul and Marco Rubio, in late 2010.
Bill Clark / CQ-Roll Call / Getty
Andrew Prokop
Andrew Prokop is a senior politics correspondent at Vox, covering the White House, elections, and political scandals and investigations. He’s worked at Vox since the site’s launch in 2014, and before that, he worked as a research assistant at the New Yorker’s Washington, DC, bureau.

Thursday morning, Sen. Rand Paul came out in favor of President Obama’s new plan to normalize relations with Cuba, saying in a radio interview that “the 50-year embargo just hasn’t worked” and that “opening up Cuba is probably a good idea.” Later that day, Sen. Marco Rubio — a potential 2016 presidential rival to Paul who’s called the deal “disgraceful“ and a ”concession to tyranny“ — said on Fox News that Paul ”has no idea what he’s talking about.”

So early Friday afternoon, Paul fired back, and directly challenged Rubio with a series of confrontational Twitter and Facebook posts. Here’s his short tweetstorm:

The “isolationist” jab is Paul’s sarcastic attempt to repurpose an epithet that’s frequently applied to him. The metaphorical reference to a “moat” is a bit strange, though, given that there already is a larger-than-moat-sized water barrier between the US and Cuba.

At press time, Sen. Rubio had not posted a social media response. But if Paul runs for president — as he looks highly likely to — it’s clearer than ever that the GOP primary will feature a spirited debate over foreign policy.

More in Politics

Podcasts
The Supreme Court abortion pills case, explainedThe Supreme Court abortion pills case, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

How Louisiana brought mifepristone back to SCOTUS.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
Trump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expectedTrump’s China policy is nearly the exact opposite of what everyone expected
Politics

As Trump heads to China, attention and resources are being shifted from Asia to yet another war in the Middle East.

By Joshua Keating
Politics
Are far-right politics just the new normal?Are far-right politics just the new normal?
Politics

Liberals are preparing for a longer war with right-wing populists than they once expected.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Flavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA headFlavored vapes doomed Trump’s FDA head
The Logoff

Why Marty Makary is out at the FDA, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Virginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymanderVirginia Democrats’ irresponsible new plan to save their gerrymander
Politics

Democrats just handed the Supreme Court’s Republicans a loaded weapon.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
Can Trump lower gas prices?Can Trump lower gas prices?
The Logoff

What suspending the gas tax would mean for you, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters