Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Amazon and Netflix Run Full-Page NYT Ads to Push Their Big-Money Web TV Shows

The ad placements come as TV lovers head home for the holidays and get ready to binge-watch to their hearts content.

Chris Fralic/Twitter
Jason Del Rey
Jason Del Rey has been a business journalist for 15 years and has covered Amazon, Walmart, and the e-commerce industry for the last decade. He was a senior correspondent at Vox.

The new-media kings are turning to old media.

On Saturday, Amazon and Netflix both took out full-page ads in the New York Times for blockbuster Web TV series that they are each betting big on. The Amazon ad touted its dramatic comedy “Mozart in the Jungle,” whose first season will be available for streaming on December 23. A pilot episode appeared earlier this year. Netflix advertised “Marco Polo,” its expensive 10-episode series set in the 13th century that debuted earlier this month.

https://twitter.com/chrisfralic/status/546358930931466242/photo/1

The ad placements come as TV lovers head home for the holidays and get ready to binge watch to their hearts content. The two shows come with big expectations but little in the way of positive buzz from critics. Both companies are banking on exclusive programming like these shows to help stand out in the increasingly competitive online video world.

Netflix, for one, may have to keep searching for its next “House of Cards.” “Marco Polo” has been called a “disappointment” by the New York Times, while Time bashed it as a “a sprawling mess.”

“Mozart in the Jungle” reviews have been mixed, though it did slip into New York Times critic Mike Hale’s Top 10 TV shows of 2014.

Of course, poor critic reviews don’t always translate into disappointing viewer numbers (viewers have given “Mozart in the Jungle’s” pilot episode a rating of 4.4 out of five stars, for example). Not that either company would say if they did.

(Hat tip to venture capitalist Chris Fralic, whose tweet first caught my eye.)

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh