Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Comcast Opponents Team Up to Kill Time Warner Cable Deal

Public interest groups and business competitors launch a new coalition to kill Comcast’s deal.

Justin Sullivan / Getty Images

Opponents of Comcast’s $45 billion deal to buy Time Warner Cable launched a new coalition Wednesday in an effort to convince federal regulators to derail the merger.

The group, called StopMegaComcast, includes 15 public interest groups, competing pay-TV operators and other organizations that have previously come out against the deal. If regulators approve the merger, Comcast*, already the country’s largest cable and Internet provider, will have a total of about 30 million subscribers, including the Los Angeles and New York markets.

Members of the group include Dish Network, the Parents Television Council, the Consumer Federation of America and the Writers Guild of America, West.

“The enforcement agencies are taking a serious look at this and they’re kicking the tires on the theories of competitive harm,” said Gene Kimmelman, president of Public Knowledge, a public interest group which is also part of the new coalition.

The goal of the group is “to create a broader, more united front on the transaction,” he said. Members are “united as to there’s no way to easily fix this and put a Band-Aid on it.”

Possible merger conditions “are inadequate,” said Jeffrey Blum, deputy general counsel for Dish, which has previously asked the government to kill the deal, in an interview. “The breadth and detail of the opposition is significant.”

A spokeswoman for Comcast said, “Hundreds of community organizations, programmers, lawmakers and diversity groups have praised the pro-consumer benefits of this transaction. It is no secret that some companies that want billions of dollars in higher fees for consumers are paying lobbying firms to organize against this transaction.”

Comcast had previously rejected arguments that its deal to acquire Time Warner Cable is bad for consumers or competitors and has offered its thoughts about why regulators should approve it.

This new group may not have a significant effect on the government’s review of the Time Warner Cable hookup since its members have already been lobbying against the deal individually.

Comcast competitors and opponents of the merger have been saying for months that questions raised by government regulators suggest the deal could be in trouble. Comcast officials have previously rejected that speculation.

It could still be several months before federal regulators make any decisions about whether to approve the deal or what conditions to require.

The review is being slowed down by an ongoing dispute between the FCC and TV programmers like CBS. The TV companies are unhappy about the agency’s plans to make its programming contracts with the cable companies available to outside parties as it reviews Comcast’s deal. The TV broadcasters have sued, and a federal appeals court is considering the issue.

Update: The FCC restarted its informal shotclock for considering the deal Wednesday morning. That doesn’t mean much, since the FCC routinely blows deadlines for considering mergers. But it does mark the official relaunch of the agency’s review.

Regulators have previously said they’d like to make a decision about the deal in the first quarter of 2015.

* Comcast owns NBCUniversal, which is a minority investor in Revere Digital, Re/code’s parent company.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh