Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Investigators Find Ethical and Contracting Problems at $7 Billion Public Safety Communications Agency

FirstNet, which has $7 billion dollars in government backing, didn’t follow ethics guidelines or contracting rules, government investigators say.

John Roman Images/Shutterstock

A quasi-government group tasked with building a multi-billion dollar wireless network for police and firefighters failed to follow federal ethics and contracting guidelines, government investigators said in a new report Tuesday detailing the lapses.

An internal complaint about possible ethnical violations at FirstNet, a government-funded organization overseen by the Commerce Department, led government investigators to uncover improperly awarded contracts, lax oversight and several examples of board members failing to follow federal ethics guidelines.

“FirstNet must strengthen management of financial disclosures and monitoring of contracts,” the Commerce Department’s Office of Inspector General concluded in the report.

Problems at FirstNet weren’t unexpected, given the group’s rocky start. But the report could hamper efforts by public safety officials to convince Congress to provide more money to build the network for police, firefighter and other local public safety agencies. The project is being funded by a wireless airwaves auction that has already raised $42 billion, far more than anyone had publicly predicted.

In response, a Commerce Department spokesman said in a statement that “as in any startup organization, we recognized that in the early stages of FirstNet there were administrative missteps and areas where documentation could have been improved,” adding that the department concurs with the investigators’ recommendations, “most of which are in place already.”

FirstNet echoed that response in a blog post Tuesday.

FirstNet was created by Congress in 2012 to build a national wireless broadband network for first responders. Police and fire departments have complained that they still aren’t able to communicate well during emergencies because they don’t have compatible equipment.

Overseen by the Commerce Department, FirstNet is governed by a 15-member board made up of government, industry and public safety officials. So far, this paid group has mostly been staffing up and making preparations to actually build the massive wireless network.

Congress gave FirstNet $7 billion from money raised during a wireless airwaves auction to help fund the new national network.

Government investigators found that FirstNet officials improperly awarded two contracts and failed to supervise contractors, which resulted in about $11 million in costs billed to the government without documentation to show why the expenditures were necessary.

Several board members also deliberately filed incomplete or incorrect public financial disclosure forms, investigators found. One board member reported spending no time on FirstNet business in an effort to avoid filing a public financial disclosure, the report said.

Another filed a form late and didn’t disclose he had “substantial assets” in a conflicting company even though Commerce Department lawyers had previously told him not to work on any matters involving the company. He only filed a corrected form after government investors demanded it, eight months later, according to the report.

Rep. Greg Walden, R-Ore., chairman of the House Communications and Technology subcommittee, said Tuesday the report confirmed previous suspicions about problems at FirstNet and promised to hold more oversight hearings on the group next year.

Democratic Sen. Jay Rockefeller of West Virginia, who helped create FirstNet and is retiring soon, said in a statement he continues to trust that the group “is in good hands” and he is “confident that they will make sure to carefully abide” by the rules in the future.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

See More:

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh