Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Is Flappy Bird “Gone Forever”? Not Even Close.

The now-removed game is a first for digital scarcity.

Flappy Bird creator Dong Nguyen wants to believe that by yanking the maddeningly addictive game from Apple’s and Google’s mobile app stores, “it’s gone forever.”

Maybe the removal has put his own conscience at ease — he has called the game’s now notorious addictiveness unintentional — but, for better or for worse, he’s wrong. Flappy Bird is still flapping away on millions of phones and tablets — in an app that will never be updated.

In his Forbes interview, Nguyen walked back the $50,000/day revenue claim reported last week by The Verge, but he seems sure about one thing: His game ain’t coming back from the dead.

The concept of digital scarcity usually only arises when someone is withholding something from legal online channels because they believe doing so will protect future profits. Your favorite band isn’t on iTunes? Your favorite TV show isn’t on Netflix? That might change, once the right deal is cut.

Interest in Flappy Bird is still accelerating, though, perhaps because Nguyen has sparked an entirely new type of digital scarcity. By removing the app from stores, the developer made the phones that still have his game part of an exclusive club, as well as the object of a few moronic eBay sales. The extant copies are all we get, which is a quaint idea in a world of infinite, indefinite availability.

Copycat developers have of course rushed to fill the void left by the game, but giving them headlines is missing the point. If they can match or even improve on Nguyen’s simple game, they won’t be able to match the cult of Flappy Bird, which persists in social media and arguably thrives in the game’s absence.

Killing the game at its peak has ironically given it an iconic and memorable exit, while nearly all other games — some of which took thousands of people and millions of hours to make — merely fade away.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

See More:

More in Technology

Future Perfect
The 5 most unhinged revelations from Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAIThe 5 most unhinged revelations from Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAI
Future Perfect

The Musk v. OpenAI trial is over. Here are the receipts.

By Sara Herschander
Politics
Data centers could actually be good for your hometownData centers could actually be good for your hometown
Politics

The case for the buildings America loves to hate.

By Eric Levitz
Future Perfect
How to fall in love with humanity againHow to fall in love with humanity again
Future Perfect

Tech culture has made contempt for humanity feel enlightened. We can do better.

By Sigal Samuel
America, Actually
Inside the fight over America’s data centersInside the fight over America’s data centers
Podcast
America, Actually

“The ugliest thing I’ve ever seen”: How New Jersey residents feel about a data center in their backyard.

By Astead Herndon
Podcasts
Could you spot an AI-written book?Could you spot an AI-written book?
Podcast
Podcasts

An author set up an experiment to find out.

By Amina Al-Sadi and Noel King
Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram