Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

No March Madness for Cord Cutters

It’s going to be very hard to watch this year’s tournament without a pay-TV subscription.

Kevork Djansezian/Getty Images
Peter Kafka
Peter Kafka covered media and technology, and their intersection, at Vox. Many of his stories can be found in his Kafka on Media newsletter, and he also hosts the Recode Media podcast.

It’s March Madness time, which means it’s time to fill out brackets, repeat bogus claims about lost productivity and watch a lot of college basketball.

It’s also time to make sure that your pay-TV subscription is up to date. A good chunk of the tournament’s 67 games will only be available to people who have access to Turner-owned cable channels TNT, TBS and TruTV. And for the first time ever, that includes the two semifinal games on Saturday, April 5: If you don’t have pay TV, or a friend who does, and you don’t want to watch the Final Four games at a bar, you’re going to be out of luck.

The (legal) Internet won’t help you, either: There are official tournament apps available for iOS, Android, Windows Phone, Kindle, etc., which will stream all the games, but the only way to get the ones that are on cable channels are by “authenticating” — proving that you have a pay-TV subscription. The CBS games — including the April 7 final — will stream for free, though.

Keeping giant sports events with national audiences restricted to pay TV is obviously a controversial move. So expect to see a flood of righteous anger on the Internet, coupled with calls for Congressional action.

Just like we saw in January, when the college football championship game was restricted to ESPN.

Oh. What’s that? You didn’t hear a peep?

And, come to think of it, you didn’t hear much grousing last month, when a good chunk of the Sochi Olympics was only available to people with access to NBCUniversal’s* cable channels?

Hrmmmm. Maybe this time is the time that changes. But right now most Americans who like sports have made some sort of peace with the fact that liking sports on TV often requires a pay-TV subscription. Increasingly so, actually: Big-time sports have been migrating from free broadcast channels to pay channels for some time.

As I wrote a year ago:

The free-to-pay move serves the interests of the TV Industrial Complex in several ways: The cable networks, flush with cash from subscriber fees, can afford to pay big bucks for the rights to what is must-see TV for many people. And because it’s must-see TV for many people, it helps raise the overall value of the cable networks (Rupert Murdoch used the same strategy to turn Fox into a legitimate broadcast operation two decades ago).

And moving big-time sports to pay TV helps pay TV, period. Nielsen figures there are five million cord-cutters, or cord-nevers, and that number would presumably be much bigger if you could get sports online without paying for TV.

I don’t see this trend reversing, either. If anything, it could accelerate — particularly if Aereo wins its court case, and either CBS or Fox makes good on their threat/pledge to move their best programming off of broadcast TV.

Meanwhile, I’ve got three days to figure out how find TruTV on my cable grid. Wisconsin/American tips off Thursday at 12:40.

* NBCUniversal is an investor in Re/code.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh