Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Protecting Yourself From the “Heartbleed” Security Flaw

Answers to this week’s tech questions.

You have some tech questions, I have some answers. Every Friday, I try to resolve these mysteries, succinctly and in plain language. Please send questions to walt@recode.net. Note that I won’t be able to diagnose your personal tech glitches and problems. I also reserve the right to edit questions for length or clarity, and to combine similar inquiries.

Q. Reading about the “Heartbleed” security flaw leaves me confused. What can I as a consumer do to protect my data? Must I change all my passwords?

A. There’s very little any average consumer can do to ensure that her data is safe, because this extremely nasty security vulnerability directly affected servers of the websites you use, and not individual computers or other devices. Still, if hackers exploited it, experts say they could have stolen consumers’ passwords. Trouble is, even sites that now say they were affected can’t say for sure if anything was stolen.

The best thing to do is to wait until a site you frequent tells you it has patched the security hole, and then change your password. You can also check if a site is fixed or still vulnerable by typing its address into the online tool here, provided by the security company Qualys, which rates sites’ security by letter grade. If a site gets any variation of an A, I’d advise continuing to use it, but with a new password. If it gets anything less, I’d try and stay off of it for now and wait to change the password. (If you are an Apple user, the company says its operating systems and “key Web-based services” weren’t affected, but that doesn’t mean that sites you visit on Apple devices were unaffected.)

You should also consider this an opportunity to vary your passwords more, and make them longer and at least a bit more complex. You might also consider using “two-factor authentication” at sites that offer it, like Google. This is a system that requires not only a password to log in, but also a changing, randomly generated code that’s either sent as a text to your phone or produced by a mobile app.

Q. I have long used, and liked, a Mac laptop, but I have recently retired, and would like a new all-in-one desktop for writing. I see that I can get a Windows version for much less than an iMac. Would it be a tough transition, and what extra software might I need?

A. There are some very nice Windows all-in-one desktops, but the current Windows 8.1 operating system, which uses a tablet interface and touchscreen, might pose an adjustment problem for a Mac user. However, if you use only the desktop interface on the machine, which is very similar to previous versions of Windows, you should be able to make the change without much trouble. As for software, I can’t say for sure what you’ll need, but writers will usually want Microsoft Office, or at least Microsoft Word, which typically isn’t included in a full version on these low-cost PCs.

Shared Photo Stream

Q. I understand what Apple’s Photo Stream does, synchronizing the pictures I take on my iPhone with iPhoto on my Mac. But what’s a “shared” Photo Stream?

A. A shared Photo Stream allows you to invite other people — usually a small group of friends or family — to see pictures you select for the shared stream on their devices, as well. They can also add pictures to the shared stream. In effect, it’s like a small, private social network for pictures, complete with the ability of viewers to add “Likes” and comments. For instance, I have used it to share vacation photos with family at home, and a friend uses it to share baby pictures. You can invite up to 100 people to a shared stream, and include up to 5,000 photos. More information is here and here.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh