Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Domestic violence has been dropping for 20 years. Here’s how to keep that going.

A family in a domestic violence shelter in Mobridge, South Dakota.
A family in a domestic violence shelter in Mobridge, South Dakota.
A family in a domestic violence shelter in Mobridge, South Dakota.
Stephan Gladieu // Getty

Yesterday, the Bureau of Justice Statistics put out a new analysis of domestic violence over the past decade (from 2003 to 2012). The numbers look good. Very good. Domestic violence hasn’t continued to drop at the rate it did in the 1990s, but it’s stayed low.

Even the recession, which early reports suggested was driving a rise in domestic violence as families felt under stress, didn’t have much of an effect. And while “serious violent victimization” — that’s rapes, sexual assaults, robberies, and aggravated assaults — saw a spike in 2006, serious domestic violence didn’t.

Screen_shot_2014-04-18_at_12

But advocates, looking at a different set of numbers, are seeing a growing problem: a persistent gap in support for survivors of domestic violence. That means that as well as things are going, we’re not doing as much as we could.

The rise of the "support gap" for survivors

Domestic violence dropped in the ‘90s after the issue rose to national attention. Government started putting money toward law enforcement outreach and survivor support through the Violence Against Women Act and other programs, while general public awareness meant that survivors were more likely to know they could find help. But while more public awareness means that Americans are less likely to be victims of domestic violence, it also means that victims are more likely to seek out support services. “As police response improves, as prosecution and court response improves, as medical response improves, referrals to domestic violence programs go up,” says Monica McLaughlin of the National Network to End Domestic Violence.

While the recession hasn’t had much impact on rates of domestic violence, it has had an impact on how many survivors seek out services. And McLaughlin says that even though economic vulnerability won’t turn a non-abusive family into an abusive one, it can exacerbate abusive relationships: “poverty is a co-conspirator of an abuser,” she says. But federal funding for shelters and other services has remained more or less flat. The result: a gap between requests for services and the ability to provide them, which has remained persistent throughout the recession.

McLaughlin’s group, NNEDV, has conducted a “One-Day Census” of shelters and service providers since 2006. They’ve seen “unmet requests” go from just over 5,000 in the first year of the survey to 9,000-10,000 every year since 2008.

“Those numbers are stubborn. They’re not moving,” McLaughlin says. She suggests that federal funding would need to “increase significantly” to address the support gap. Whether or not that happens, one thing is clear: the progress the United States has made against domestic violence over the past twenty years is real and durable. But while survivors can now feel more confident that they will be listened to and can get help, another type of public awareness is needed to insure that the help they expect to see is really there for them.

Policy
Is Trump’s Justice Department trying to discredit itself?Is Trump’s Justice Department trying to discredit itself?
Policy

The DOJ used to avoid spectacles like the Louise Lucas raid.

By Ian Millhiser
Politics
What the Supreme Court still has left to decide this termWhat the Supreme Court still has left to decide this term
Politics

Democracy and Donald Trump dominate the Court’s remaining docket.

By Ian Millhiser
Politics
The Supreme Court seems a bit nervous about letting the police track you with your phoneThe Supreme Court seems a bit nervous about letting the police track you with your phone
Politics

The justices were concerned that the Trump administration is asking for too much in a major police surveillance case.

By Ian Millhiser
Politics
The Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track youThe Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track you
Politics

Chatrie v. United States asks what limits the Constitution places on the surveillance state in an age of cellphones.

By Ian Millhiser
Policy
Pam Bondi’s ouster makes Trump’s Justice Department even more dangerousPam Bondi’s ouster makes Trump’s Justice Department even more dangerous
Policy

The best thing about Bondi was her incompetence.

By Ian Millhiser
Culture
Me Too revealed a lot of villains. Why is Epstein the one we still care about?Me Too revealed a lot of villains. Why is Epstein the one we still care about?
Culture

How the Epstein story became an American parable.

By Constance Grady