Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

What Jurors in Apple-Samsung Case Will Hear Monday Instead of Closing Arguments

An appeals court ruling means the jury will have to hear another couple of hours of expert testimony before getting jury instructions.

Everett Collection / Shutterstock

If things had gone as planned, jurors in the latest Apple-Samsung patent trial would have gotten to hear final arguments on Monday and perhaps even begun their deliberations.

However, an appellate ruling in a related case that came down on Friday threw a monkey wrench in the works. As a result, jurors will have to sit through another couple of hours of mind-numbing expert testimony.

That’s because in deciding an Apple-Motorola case, the appeals court ruled, among other things, how a particular term in one of the Apple patents should be understood.

It’s all really complicated and a bit dull, but the upshot is that Judge Lucy Koh decided each side will get an hour to make their case on what the new definition means to their cases.

And after enduring that excitement, the eight-member panel is also expected to hear their final jury instructions. While they will have Judge Koh’s 56 pages of written instructions in the jury room, the law requires that the instructions be read aloud, a process that is also likely to take a couple of hours.

On Tuesday, things should pick up as lawyers for each side get to make one last appeal to the jury. Apple and Samsung will each have two hours of final arguments, with Apple up first on the main case, followed by Samsung making its arguments for why it didn’t infringe on Apple’s patents as well as a counterclaim that certain iPhones and iPod touch devices infringe on two Samsung-owned patents. Apple will then get a last chance to argue that last point.

Then, barring any further surprises, the jury should get the case late Tuesday.

As a recap, Apple is seeking more than $2 billion in damages on its patent claims. Samsung maintains its phones and tablets don’t infringe on Apple’s patents, nor were the patents properly issued in the first place. Even if it does infringe, Samsung says, Apple has greatly exaggerated the value of its patents.

Among the most interesting developments in the trial so far is the fact that Google has agreed to handle the defense of some of the Android-related features at issue in the case and to bear some of the legal liability if Samsung loses.

For those feeling left out of all the fun, here are the final jury instructions, all 56 pages of them.

Apple v Samsung Jury Instructions Docket 1842 by inafried

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh