Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Facebook Tests New Privacy Tweaks

Will everyone freak out again?

Gil C / Shutterstock

Facebook knows it’s bad for Facebook when its users freak out at privacy changes. It wants to stop making that happen.

The company is in the midst of rolling out a few slight tweaks to its privacy settings, an attempt to minimize the accidental sharing incidents that often raise the hackles of Facebook’s 1.2 billion users.

“Sometimes when people share things on Facebook, they feel like it’s been shared with more people than they wanted,” Mike Nowak,* Facebook’s privacy product manager, said in a roundtable with reporters on Tuesday. “When people have an unpleasant surprise like this, it’s bad for them and it’s bad for us.”

The changes aren’t massive. Facebook plans to tweak a drop-down menu that lets you select which groups of people you share posts with — though, curiously, by hiding some of the other group options in an extra sub-menu. (Facebook says the two most visible options, “Public” and “Friends,” are the most often used.)

The company is also testing short privacy surveys to see what features people aren’t comfortable with, and has begun to issue short privacy check notifications to remind people that they’re sharing posts that anyone on Facebook can see.

Facebook has a rocky history with privacy settings. A number of the company’s past sweeping privacy changes have caused public outcry, resulting in very public apologies from Mark Zuckerberg (not to mention the occasional 20-year Federal Trade Commission privacy audit).

Which is, I imagine, why Facebook is making small tweaks rolled out gradually, rather than any sudden major changes, to how sharing works. Smart move, I’d say.

Expect to see some of these changes appear over the next few weeks.

* Nowak is married to Re/code editor Liz Gannes, my colleague, who had no input on this story.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Are humanoid robots all hype?Are humanoid robots all hype?
Podcast
Podcasts

AI is making them better — but they’re not going to be doing your chores anytime soon.

By Avishay Artsy and Sean Rameswaram
Future Perfect
The old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemicThe old tech that could help stop the next airborne pandemic
Future Perfect

Glycol vapors, explained.

By Shayna Korol
Future Perfect
Elon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wantsElon Musk could lose his case against OpenAI — and still get what he wants
Future Perfect

It’s not about who wins. It’s about the dirty laundry you air along the way.

By Sara Herschander
Life
Why banning kids from AI isn’t the answerWhy banning kids from AI isn’t the answer
Life

What kids really need in the age of artificial intelligence.

By Anna North
Culture
Anthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque messAnthropic owes authors $1.5B for pirating work — but the claims process is a Kafkaesque mess
Culture

“Your AI monster ate all our work. Now you’re trying to pay us off with this piece of garbage that doesn’t work.”

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
Some deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapySome deaf children are hearing again because of a new gene therapy
Future Perfect

A medical field that almost died is quietly fixing one disease at a time.

By Bryan Walsh