Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Live-tweeting a prostitution sting is a terrible idea

The police department of Prince George’s County in Maryland decided to hold a prostitution sting to arrest sex workers and would-be clients next week. That’s not uncommon.

But they then decided it was a good idea to live-tweet the sting as it was happening — which would include taking photos of suspects and posting them on Twitter — using the hashtag #PGPDVice.

What’s more, the department decided to announce this decision in advance, patting itself on the back for its “progressive, and we believe unprecedented, social media tactic.”

When it announced the sting on its blog, the Police Department claimed it would target “those soliciting prostitutes.” After the backlash they received from sex-worker advocates late Thursday, they published a second blog post doubling down on that claim: “Our Vice Unit will target those who choose to solicit a prostitute, not prostitutes themselves.”

But the photo on the original blog post announcing the sting showed a police officer escorting a woman with her hands zip-tied behind her back — which implied that even if they won’t be “targeting” sex workers for arrest, they still may be taking pictures of them. (That picture has since been removed from the post, but the Police Department has not explicitly said they won’t be arresting or taking py.)

It’s mystifying that the police would think that live-tweeting a sting would get them any good publicity. After all, it was just last week that the New York Police Department saw its attempt at Twitter outreach go terribly, when they tried to start the hashtag #myNYPD to get pictures of people hanging out with the cops and instead got inundated with stories of people who had been targeted by stop-and-frisk and racial profiling.

But what’s even more mystifying in the case of the Maryland cops is that they announced this a week in advance — giving critics a head start on using the hashtag. And the critics have taken full advantage of it:


UPDATE: This article has been updated to include the Prince George’s Police Department blog post attempting to clarify the purpose of the sting.

Policy
Is Trump’s Justice Department trying to discredit itself?Is Trump’s Justice Department trying to discredit itself?
Policy

The DOJ used to avoid spectacles like the Louise Lucas raid.

By Ian Millhiser
Politics
What the Supreme Court still has left to decide this termWhat the Supreme Court still has left to decide this term
Politics

Democracy and Donald Trump dominate the Court’s remaining docket.

By Ian Millhiser
Politics
The Supreme Court seems a bit nervous about letting the police track you with your phoneThe Supreme Court seems a bit nervous about letting the police track you with your phone
Politics

The justices were concerned that the Trump administration is asking for too much in a major police surveillance case.

By Ian Millhiser
Politics
The Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track youThe Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track you
Politics

Chatrie v. United States asks what limits the Constitution places on the surveillance state in an age of cellphones.

By Ian Millhiser
Policy
Pam Bondi’s ouster makes Trump’s Justice Department even more dangerousPam Bondi’s ouster makes Trump’s Justice Department even more dangerous
Policy

The best thing about Bondi was her incompetence.

By Ian Millhiser
Culture
Me Too revealed a lot of villains. Why is Epstein the one we still care about?Me Too revealed a lot of villains. Why is Epstein the one we still care about?
Culture

How the Epstein story became an American parable.

By Constance Grady